The argument ‘why is it there then?’ is still flawed, even if you are sHoCkEd by an argument by comparison.
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
879 points (95.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
11432 readers
1819 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, the third post is "Local Tumblr User Doesn't Understand Reductio ad Absurdum; More at 11."
The user isn't saying leg hair is like cancer (like fucking obviously; how disingenuous would you be to even suggest that?). They're saying the argument of "it wouldn't grow there if it wasn't supposed to" is completely stupid – that it has little discriminative power to distinguish what's good and bad if you don't already know. It isn't even nearly limited to the absurdity of that contradictory example:
"Sorry, honey, but the dick cheese wouldn't be there if it wasn't supposed to."
It's a fine-ish retort to get a seven-year-old to chill out, but it's total bullshit when you don't already know leg hair on women is fine. Pointing out that "Gravity is real because most people think it is" is a bad argument by saying "Germs didn't exist because most people thought they didn't" doesn't mean I'm trying to say believing gravity is like disbelieving germ theory; I'm pointing out the argument doesn't hold water regardless of what the fallacy (in the OP's case, a pretty clear appeal to nature) was supporting.
TL;DR: Denying the means, not the conclusion.
load more comments
(20 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
okay but the local man did make a smart argument by identifying the Appeal to Nature fallacy
load more comments
(20 replies)
My Wife: "I'm just warning you, I haven't shaved in a few days."
Me: "Oh no! Anyway..."
"If I didn't want a sexy sasquatch, I wouldn't have married my best friend."
load more comments
(1 replies)
I think "a few days" is the problem zone. It will be itchy and rough stubble by then (at least for me). After like a month it smooths back out. It could well be your wife telling you "this will be uncomfortable for both of us, at least wait a bit, or give me time to shave".
load more comments
(1 replies)
He’s not comparing hair to cancer, he is demonstrating that just because something grows doesn’t mean it’s supposed to be there.
load more comments
(42 replies)
I'm 60, and I realized recently, maybe in the past five years, that I've lost all the hair on my legs. I was a bit confused, I remember having hair on my legs, so I looked at some old pictures. Yep, I used to have hairy legs. I like having smooth legs, it's nice. I still have all the hair on my head, so that's good, too. Small consolation for having one foot in the grave, I suppose.
The hair doesn't harm or otherwise negatively impact the organism's survival rate. The organism's immune system didn't evolve to prevent and kill hair cells as they arise.
load more comments
(4 replies)
As someone with hair loss: it also protects surprisingly well from bumps and scrapes, as well as being warmer than you'd think!
It also protects against mosquitoes
load more comments
(1 replies)
I wonder how old people have to be to get the “more at 6” capper. I know I use it a lot so my kids get it, but I’d bet most don’t.
I legit heard a news anchor say “and what it could mean for your weekend” on the TV at a bar recently, so they’re keeping it alive.
Hair helps prevent insect bites, but you have to be pretty hairy. So it is useful
load more comments
(2 replies)
I agree, obviously. With modern soap, hair is all but useless, and we should all be bald and glossy, the way nature attempts to deny us.
load more comments
(7 replies)
There is a difference between what was evolutionarily advantageous in the last 150k years and what we prefer today. More at nine.
Between that comparison and sonic the hedgehog I’ll gladly take a blue rodent eating chilli dogs.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›