this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
46 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

6579 readers
322 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whether people want to give Meta all their food data is another question entirely.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago

that'll be a fun conversation with the insurance company (who knows you're diabetic) when they buy everyone's footage from meta and they see you stuffing your face with triple chocolate lava murder cheesecake

I saw some fuckwit wearing Meta glasses at a show I went to a couple months ago, and I had to calm myself down and control the impulse to rip them off of the girl’s face and snap them in half. Seriously, anyone who buys or uses those fucking things is an abject idiot. Nobody is interested in being constantly surveilled, and that’s what you’re enabling if you use “smart glasses” sold by Meta.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a change.org out there somewhere to ban these from public use. Many States at least have laws in place you can't record audio/video without proper "all party" consent. I'm sure Meta will buy those politicians and get that changed eventually, but for now it's law.

https://www.change.org/p/ban-meta-glasses-ray-ban-from-public-and-private-use

https://www.change.org/p/urgent-demand-to-update-privacy-laws-to-protect-our-children-from-meta-ray-ban

[–] teft@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Many States at least have laws in place you can’t record audio/video without proper “all party” consent.

As much as I dislike these things, that isn't always true. Many states you have no privacy in public spaces. It's why paparazzi exist.

There are laws for recording confidential communications, private conversations, or inside private residences but otherwise anyone can record outside perfectly well.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hate these fucking glasses so much.

The only, ONLY acceptable use case for these is for sight impaired people. Apparently its a game changer for them.

For anyone else, eradicate these and all of big tech from the world. Please!

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry, what’s the benefit with them compared to normal glasses for the sight impaired?

[–] randy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Sight impaired" as in "blind", or close to it. That is, vision problems that can't be corrected with lenses. A camera that can describe what your face is pointed at would be a game changer such people.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh gotcha, thanks yeah that makes sense

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

And totally not enabling Meta to make a huge consumer profile database that's totally not getting sold to the highest bidders I'm sure.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can guarantee you this will be very hit or miss, unless you're telling it what you're eating. Even then the nutrional data will be garbage due to the huge variety in ways to prepare food.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

regardless... that's fucked up that's a target

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Even with the privacy issue aside, the glasses are a shitty product. What they do, they do poorly.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's like they are training a baby on what reality is by feeding it all the observable data they can get their hands on.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

We don’t allow them where I work at a Driving Test Centre in UK. Which is awkward, as you can now have these glasses with prescription lenses. Candidates can either test without them, or don’t test and lose your test fee. We’ve had a couple of people refused a test and they weren’t happy. Oh dear, how sad, never mind.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ignoring the fact that this has to be incredibly inaccurate. How do they do all this processing on small glasses? Even sending video to the phone to be uploaded to meta and processed there would be pretty expensive for a small device like this.