This needs to involve some time in prison for the guilty.
And Pam is most certainly guilty given her little performances in Congress.
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
491 points (99.6% liked)
politics
29029 readers
1505 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
BUT THE DOW IS ~~OVER~~ ^almost^ 50,000 DOL... 50,000 POINTS!
Not any more. We can care about raping kids now.
Congress:
The DOJ must provide all the documents, not withold information for sake of saving embarrassment or protecting politicians, and let us see all redactions or they're breaking the law!
Hey DOJ, the DOJ broke the law! Arrest yourself!
We're so smart!
Me:
Is anyone surprised
No, absolutely no one.
It's remarkable that they curated it and the files still show that a large portion of the modern far right was somewhere between acquaintances with and funded by and taking orders from a convicted child sex trafficker.
Process this: If you think that the stuff you've seen in the Epstein Files is outrageous, and people should be tossed in dungeons over it, understand the very worst stuff has been quarantined. If you this stuff is bad, wait until we find out what they're hiding.
Epstein dealt with a lot of evil people and evil deeds, and he said that Trump was the most evil person he'd ever known. I'm hearing stories of murdered babies and such, and as crazy as they sound, so far the stuff I've heard from the Epstein Files has turned out to be true, so I'm assuming the rumors are true as well.
Your last source hints at it, but keep digging. I've seen some fucked up stuff, but I didn't save the sources, so I won't repeat them. I think I might start.
I will never understand how the women in this administration cover for the men who raped girls.
...because gender doesn't dictate if someone is ethical or empathetic.
I know
Power hunger and greed come to mind as reasons.
I think there's a complicated kind of fig leaf which is very clearly unethical but it allows these people to retain some dignity.
I'm sure there's a word for it but in criminal justice everyone needs a lawyer to defend them, even someone accused of awful crimes with very strong positive evidence of their crimes. I've heard defense lawyers say that even if they dislike their client, they need to do their very best to defend them or else their lack of defense might be the grounds for an appeal later. That does kinda make sense to me.
The extension of this concept is that everyone gets to make their best argument. Even in business / contractual disputes, both sides have an opportunity to make their best argument, their best version of the truth. "Best version" in this context means, emphasising your best actions and minimising your worst.
I guess this can kind of be corrupted in a way to be "well if I don't spin this for then someone else will", which is where ethics goes out the window really. As in, someone accused of a crime might be entitled to appropriate defense, but someone who's been abusing women their entire life is not entitled to have a government official cover up their behavior by obfuscating details or documents. In the same way, often in a professional role your only recourse if you object to something is to resign.
In summary, Bondi is an awful human but this is how I imagine she justifies that.
She doesn't even try to justify it, beyond "Because I can, and fuck you."
Because sociopaths are sociopaths, even if they're women.
Though I do wonder who shat in Bondi's cornflakes to make her such a concentrated ball of corruption and spite. She seems like she hates the whole world, but lacks the nerve to leave it.
So since they wouldn't release over half of the documents. We can assume those all have trump and his buddies in them. Millions of documents on those people specifically.
And yet the orange turdsack's name still appeared more times than the rest of the big names combined... quite telling, ain't it?
More times than Harry Potter's name appears in all the Harry Potter books.
Trump called in every favour that was owed, used every asset he could to get a second term in the white house, ffs he staged the shooting at that rally so he would win so he could keep those files hidden and considering how much effort there is invested in diversions just to keep everyone's mind of the files.
The story is not news. Last year we heard that the fbi had 100,000 man hours on people making redactions of trumps involvement; the files aren’t even half of them, and there has been NO video released, blurred or otherwise
The wall st journal is a Murdoch shit rag, we cannot trust ANY US media - NYT, Wapo, WSJ, cnn, msnbc, Fox, they are ALL complicit in the coverup, and actively aiding the fascist takeover of the US government
Yeah, we know
Wait, what?!
Duh
No way they would do somethings ng that self serving and I just. More lies... /S
