Exactly why he bombed Iran.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
540 points (99.5% liked)
Politics
1117 readers
1 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
And his bas will lick it up like a dog in a gravey bowl.
That e is off the hook
I like how it fell off of "base" and landed all the way down there.
That would be pressure from Israel.
Yeah this has always been the most telling thing about trump that so many ARE NOT jumping on. He will sue anyone for the slightest thing. Where are the slander lawsuits? Why is he quiet? The silence speaks novels.
the woman told agents she had been sexually abused by Epstein from the age of 13, beginning approximately in 1983, while she was living in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.
Better known as raping a girl.
Tired of these weasel words.
Maybe she used the words "sexually abused" when speaking to agents. Then this would simply be accurate reporting.
Or maybe she said "raped" or use different words. Without saying the original it's impossible to know.
In the files, you can see that there was a witness willing to testify, so I took out "unsubstantiated" in the headline:
This is correct, and right, and why billionaire media exists only to serve themselves.
JFC, he bombed Iran, and y'all are still talking about this?!
/s
The Dow is over 50,000
48,977.92
Typical Woke response, using facts to take away from the accomplishment of the greatest president in American history.
Slandering the winner of the FIFA Peace Prize and current holder of the Nobel Peace Prize medal is shameful. Does the FIFA Peace Prize mean nothing to you?!
Laying it on this thick and some dipshit will probably still whine that you didn't put le smoothbrain s on the end of this
Are you actually insinuating that Trump's sycophants wouldn't say exactly the same, or something just as smooth brained?
My target audience is people with 3+ neurons
Trump will have to get really creative now.
Two things can be talked about.
There’s probs explicit video of it as well, Epstein was called the worlds greatest blackmailer
That's a big part of the problem: much of the best evidence, photos and videos of victims, many of them underage, in compromising situations, would be extreme privacy issues as best, and actual child porn at worst.
We are so conditioned to accept photographic evidence over everything else, that we never really fully believe anything unless we've seen video or photos of it. This evidence exists in the Epstein Files, but it can never be released. It's a Catch-22 that protects the worst people on the planet.
If that information came out, people would be outraged. I read a DESCRIPTION of a photograph of an underage girl being abused by several men, and just the description outraged me. There was blood, and the girl looked semi-conscious, and she said that she thought she was going to die. As it turns out, that was only ONE photo out of ten photos of this girl. But since the photos can't be shown, it doesn't make the media, which generally relies on visual media these days.
It's time for ALL those photos to get graphic descriptions, and start releasing those descriptions with big media promotion. Just the descriptions will make people demand justice.
2nd. Ghislane is only just now playing her sweatheart deal card, is looking at a pardon and didn't have to fake her death and move to Tel Aviv.
Breaking news: fork found in kitchen
Bah they'll just say "miner" and blame it on a typo.
I know when they say "a woman when she was a minor" means a current adult who was a minor at the time. But why does that even need to be said? Why not just say "... Trump sexually abused a child in this year."?
The only 2 options are that she's now an adult, or deceased, which should get its own sentence or paragraph anyway.
It's phrased that way because it obfuscates.
He abused and killed multiple minors according to some of the survivors
We can assume it's true if she dies within 1 or 2 years.
Honestly I don't think we even have to wait to assume it's true.
She and the witness "disappeared," so they might already be buried there.
"Claim"
Yeah no shit, people have claimed that for years. Provide proof, and then put the son of a bitch away. I'm so sick of more headlines about nothing fucking happening.
Yeah where's all the victims that pulled out their phone while they were getting raped??!!! 20 years ago when smartphones were only an idea they could have just used theirs!!! /s
As far as I know a few victims have described genitals, as well as providing accurate descriptions of relatively unknown locations and associates. There is also a shit ton amount of proof that these victims were around Epstein and Trump during this time (pictures and communications). There probably is a lot more, but I'm merely making a point that proof in sexual abuse is very hard to find, and in most cases only possible right after the fact.
When a zillion different women come out with allegations against a man who will legally (and maybe illegally) destroy their lives for doing so, and the allegations keep coming? I know that's not legal proof, but I feel like it should be.
Thousands of scientists from hundreds (if not thousands, I actually don't know how many cultures there are) of cultures all around the globe agree in all their different languages that climate change is real.
People like my coworker — 'Oil doesn't cause climate change or environmental damage — those scientists just want to get paid.'
Do you understand what I'm trying to say? I can replace the words in the analogy to match the context of the conservation if you want.
Well they are right. Oil does not cause climate change or enviromeltal damage.
!Its just how we accuire it, process it, transfer it and use it that causes climate change and enviromental damage!<
U look dumb
Yes yes, water isn't wet it makes things wet