this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
81 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6380 readers
102 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has fined Reddit £14.47 million (over $19.5 million) for collecting and using the personal information of children under 13 without adequate safeguards.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fierysparrow89@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hard to interpret this amount any other way than permission to keep doing the same thing. $20M is like a rounding error for Big Tech.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Really? Reddit is still smaller than the big guys

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Q4 Revenue grew 70% year-over-year to $726 million. 2025 Revenue grew 69% to $2.2 billion. Q4 Net Income $252 million, 35% of revenue. Source

But that's cool, I'm sure 19 million will teach 'em. I wonder how much they sold that data for.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, it's essentially "give us some pocket change to stop us really doing something about it".

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

data protection law as an excuse to require age verification, have we had that before anywhere?

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

Hey UK government, why did they have all that data in the first place? Could it be the online safety act?

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Y'know, it just occured to me, but this push towards child safety opens up another opportunity for Lemmy to grow at the expense of reddit. If reddit puts in age verification, the kids will still need somewhere to go to get answers to stuff like video game questions and random tech support problems. They won't be able to use major platforms though, they're going to be effectively banned from those. They can't be banned from all of our servers though, that's just impractical. So, they could potentially ask their questions and get answers here if they wanted, assuming we're good enough at providing answers.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

The kids would be the ones answering as well, so that shouldn't be a problem.

I know a lot of people here come from Reddit, but I'm sure I'm not the only one here who grew up using old school phpBB forums to talk to other kids about random stuff online after school. My favorite forum was not in English and probably had fewer than 100 active members, and its by far the best experience I've had online. I didn't bother much with other public social media before Mastodon.

I think at least some of us are dreaming of recreating that type of safe and fun online space, where it's possible to create more close-knit (but nevertheless anonymous) communities. Reddit isn't it, and I agree that it's not good for children (or anyone) to be on there.

Whether the Fediverse could provide it remains an open question. It certainly comes with huge moderation challenges.

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

At some point those same authorites are coming for Lemmy and the metaverse generally.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sure. The problem is we're too decentralized to make enforcement practical. They can try to come for, say, lemmy.world if they want, that's totally fine. That won't get them very far with all of Lemmy though. Too many servers can be housed in places where western law cannot easily reach, and regulating just those servers located in western countries accomplishes very little.

Advantages of being structured differently.

edit for grammar

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

The pirate bay, many big private trackers, and Anna's archive are still up despite being felony copyright infringement and directly pissing off fortune 500 companies

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

We can set it up to be insulated from them though. For one thing, we should have instances with clear rules, an appeals process, and a final decision to be done by a trial of a jury of verified users or the like. To prevent the feds from getting their hooks into the enforcement, and or prevent moderator abuse, which is what drives half of the people to lemmy to begin with.

Idk about setting it up to not have to do age checks, other than setting instances in areas where they are not beholden to the authorities and disguising their own identities as administrators?