this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
116 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

15098 readers
571 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valnao@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Imagine centering your political campaign on wanting more traffic, more noise and more crashes in the neighborhood.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago

It’s kinda covered in what you said but I feel “pollution” needs to be specified.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

She knows her target audience, who are not smart enough to understand that more bikes and transit means less road traffic, which is better for car drivers. People with one car want the ability to drive thousands of cars. It's beyond greedy and stupid.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hope she suffers an embarrassing loss over such a stupid campaign.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Most Americans are incapable of seeing the big picture. They'll drive to the polling station cursing about all the bicyclists in the road, vote against bike lanes "because I don't use them", and drive home still cursing about all the bicyclists in the road. They could have been on a bike path out of your way, you know!

[–] Ladislawgrowlo@lemy.lol 9 points 1 week ago

This depends on the education of the average American voter.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It worked for Premier doug ford (kinda like a governor) in Ontario, whom also ran on "strong mayor powers". You know strong powers like the province telling you its illegal to build bike lanes in your city for your constituents.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

Two of them? That sounds awful.

[–] agingelderly@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

What a stupid bitch

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So she promises safer streets, but wants to remove bike lanes? So how is she going to make streets safer? Reduce all speed limits to 20 MPH?

Safe(R) streets = more police

[–] homes@piefed.world 14 points 1 week ago
[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

LOL, imagine being a "local business owner" claiming to be for "thriving local business," yet being so nonsensically, terminally ignorant that you make fighting against bike lanes your central campaign issue even though bike lanes are actually good for business!

What a catastrophic dipshit.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

That's what I was thinking. You can fit a lot more people in your [local business] with a simple bike rack, than a strip mall parking lot where you gotta designate "15 minutes or get towed!" because there's only like 5 spots in front of your place.