this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
544 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

77765 readers
3434 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a suit on Monday against Samsung, Sony, LG, TCL, and Hisense, claiming in a press release that they "have been unlawfully collecting personal data through Automated Content Recognition ("ACR”) technology."

Paxton goes on to label ACR as "an uninvited, invisible digital invader," and in one of the five separately filed suits, he calls Samsung TVs "a mass surveillance system."

(page 2) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If it's illegal why isn't the state executive branch making arrests? Why isn't the state legislative banning the sale of these devices?

If I was selling an illegal product, they wouldn't be dragging my happy ass through court to get relief from my actions.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Because corporations are only people when it comes to good things. If it's a bad thing, corporate veil protects the people doing the crimes because they have (what no one who puts any thought to it would believe is) plausible deniability because they never told people to do illegal things, they just said they wanted something done and let their underlings figure it out.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 4 points 2 days ago

yeah, but you wouldn't be able to settle for a lucrative deal that the Texan elite can personally benefit from. that's the difference.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rare Ken Paxton win.

Something something about a broken clock being right twice a day.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ken Paxton saying or doing something reasonable and/or beneficial is more like finding a random page torn out from a page-a-day calendar and having it be the right day and date but from a different year

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Mass surveillance system? Yes, of course. That's the whole point. Tracking and profiling you to charge more for ads.

Lmao these smart TVs are basically the screens in the book 1984, in every house.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do YouTube next. Do websites next.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Websites have already been „done“ by the GDPR and the companies just implemented the measures with a clear malicious intent, bullying their users into compliance and blaming the horrible cookie banners they implemented on the EU.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I was responsible for a moderately high-volume site, and getting it GDPR compliant wasn't all that much effort. That's because we're not scumbags abusing our users' personal information.

And yeah, the cookie-banners bullshit isn't required, it was just passive aggression by sites butthurt that they couldn't intrusively track their users so easily anymore.

Well I mean, it was implemented about as well as California Prop 65, which had the effect of printing "This product contains chemicals known in the state of California to cause cancer" on literally everything ever made.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someday, maybe, the Paxton-bot will become self-aware.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›