this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
278 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26756 readers
2354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the president wears bandages on the back of his hand because he's “literally constantly shaking hands.”

CNN host Jake Tapper isn’t buying the official White House explanation for Donald Trump sporting bandages on the back of his hand, arguing on “The Lead” that there’s more to the president’s health picture than has been revealed.

Tapper discussed the matter with CNN chief political analyst David Axelrod and ex-Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday that Trump wears the bandages as a result of “constantly shaking hands.”

“The White House gave the same explanation for bruising back in July,” Tapper said Thursday. “Obviously, he’s 79 years old. And there is something going on with his health that they’re not telling us, because otherwise, why did he have that MRI?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Best explanation I've seen for these bandages over bruises is he is receiving an infusion intravenously every two weeks of a type of medication for dementia, like Leqembi or Kisunla. Patients on these drugs require regular MRIs to monitor brain swelling or bleeding. The drugs cause side effects of fatigue, cardiovascular changes, dizziness, etc. It doesn't stop dementia but it does slow it down.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago
[–] Lucky_Acid@lemmy.world 72 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why say something now, Jake? Why not wait until after his presidency? Then write a book about it? Then sell that book while you're doing your job on TV? Just a thought.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

I’m $ure he ha$ hi$ rea$ons.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Because he's holding out for a spot when Trump dies. Everyone in the conservative sphere is circling the White House like sharks because they know half of everyone is gone as soon as Vance sits down - because half of them are in those seats on account of being friends with Trump and nothing more.

Please die by the next month.. please..

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

He has probably already forgotten his dementia diagnosis.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It really doesn't matter until he actually collapses to the floor. Even then they'll try to spin it into something positive "Mr. president was exhausted for working the hardest anyone has ever worked."

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

It is fun to watch him have mini strokes occasionally. The one video where you could see him testing his hands and his right side just didn’t respond was beautiful. Hope he gets trapped in his shitty body.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 7 points 4 days ago

That's basically already their excuse for him falling asleep constantly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Whatever it is, I hope it hurts a lot.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

I hope it's something serious but on the cusp of treatment, cancelled because he shut down the NIH.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acme401@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

I hear no cheering or fireworks, so I'm guessing he's not.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I got a nice bottle of booze waiting for the announcement

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Bruised hand you say? JD is slacking on his primary duty

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I'm so tired of this fucking story. This evil p.o.s is never going to die. We've been hearing Trump health/mind failing stories for like 10 fucking years already...

Wake me up when he's actually dead. Unfortunately he's probably going to outlive me and I'm only 39.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

His age makes people complacent because they assume he's gonna die soon. Even if he does, I'm not sure it'll improve anything

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly.

Unless his death is imminent, I dont care.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If he's been having micro-strokes, the likelihood of a massive game-ending stroke is much higher than in the general population. Though it would be more just if he had one that rendered him crippled, incapable of speech, and in constant pain, then he lived another decade after being removed from office, having enough awareness to know that his ill-gotten gains and those of his family have been fully asset-stripped. Also, bedsores. Lots of bedsores.

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

You give what is hopefully not false hope for a brighter future!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Can the doctors be sued and brought to testify under oath that Donald is perfectly healthy?

Perjury has actual consequences IIRC

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does it? Does perjury have real consequences when literally nothing else does?

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I mean, we’ve watched multiple justices perjure themselves in national tv.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I believe that between doctor patient confidentiality and HIPAA, that will be quite difficult.

Imagine that your doctor was forced to give testimony on your health. Nobody would want that.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Patient records can be subpoenaed but the request has to be relevant to a case. the persons defense as well as the provider has the right to argue against the release, though their arguments can be overruled and the provider can be compelled to release records and testify as to your diagnosis, treatment, clinical observations, etc.

It’s wild how people will regularly assume HIPAA is some magic force that protects them from government overreach. It’s not, at all. I’m not specifically shitting on you because I see this claim repeated all the time, even just here in this thread. Your providers should make the limitations of HIPAA more clear to you. They’re probably more concerned with getting you in and out to maximize billable time bc fee for service billing is fucked. That’s a whole different nightmare

A priest during confessional has more protection from being compelled to testify than any doctor or therapist. They even have stronger protections than lawyers. Lawyer client privilege can be overturned if you are found to be abusing it to plan crimes. If you brag to a clergy about all the crimes you’re gonna do (though if they help they will be punished for helping, the confessional is still inadmissible and protected). They are even usually exempt from mandated reporter laws (even though they’re often in the highest risk categories for child sex abuse). It’s fucked that this country gives a pass to pedophiles to rape kids because of a historical precedent towards fucking nonsense; meanwhile the fields built on a base of evidence that need to build trust have a cornerstone of “oh the judicial system can compel me if you become their enemy but btw if you go to church you can literally confess to raping kids and the murder you’re planning and no one will rat you out”.

Source: work in healthcare and have had records subpoenaed (successfully fought off 2/3 attempts, fuck you government)

But granted they aren’t getting trumps records. No fucking way. Even if someone had the balls to charge him with something and claim they needed them as evidence he’d get the entire government to make sure that never happened, even if it meant falsifying or even destroying the documents

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I'm not in control of the most powerful military on the planet. Public servants need to be held to higher standards of accountability, including about personal health problems.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

File that one under "No Shit Sherlock." But he's going to dodder along for another 8 - 10 years.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago

Not fast enough.....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the president wears bandages on the back of his hand because he's “literally constantly shaking hands.”

As if that were even a slightly reasonable explanation.

[–] rosefiend@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

So ... he's using the back of his hands to shake hands ... of course he can't do that right either

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I feel they're not giving a decent reason on purpose. Better to leave everyone discussing so they're distracted from the actual shit they're pulling

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (4 children)

If he’s getting bruised from constantly shaking hands, is that enough of a fucking problem too?!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No shit, Sherlock.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Trump died at 11:58 pst

🤞

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

He wants to be on a coin so badly, he'll die for it. I say we increase the incentive, and offer him a stamp, too, even though he probably hates stamps for some MAGA reason.

[–] brotato@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand why they always feel the need to cover up presidential health issues. I know the answer is “national security,” but how exactly is it secure to have a man in obvious mental and physical decline going around “shaking hands” with other world leaders? Just own up to it and have him die at Mar-a-lago playing golf like he probably wants. That was the whole point of having JD as a backup, right?

[–] QuantumStorm@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

My bet is that they're trying to get to the two year mark before kicking Trump out. That way JD gets a little less than two years in the white house, but is still eligible to be president two more times.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Gawd, this douche, who clutched his pearls over...Biden.

FFS.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

he’s literally shaking in his boots because if he doesn’t die in the white house he’ll die in prison

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Trump won't see any prison time if he somehow survives his term. Let's not kid ourselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Wow solve any other capers by yourself there Nancy drew?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

I do hope it's serious

load more comments
view more: next ›