this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
205 points (96.0% liked)

politics

26679 readers
1745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

I mean c’mon, let’s not get too carried away, next thing ya know they’ll be wanting to tax the billionaires or something.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"b... b... bUt alL tHe BiLliOnAiReS wILl rUn aWAy. TRiCkLe DoWn eCoNoMiCs, sOmeThIng, SoMeThIng" - bootlicking cunt

Newsom has received campaign cash from billionaires such as Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings, philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, among others.

load more comments (1 replies)

Is anyone really surprised? He's just a neoliberal that's had a lot of good press this year.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (16 children)

The only reason Newsom has had any interest from the broader electorate is that he was outspoken in opposing Trump. The minute he enters the primary and starts spouting the same valueless, donor-approved, corporate drivel as Kamala, Jefferies, Schumer, etc., he's going to flame out fast.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This and he was married to that thing Don Jr. was with.

Yuck.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Eww explains a lot

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Jon Stewart, 2028.

The problem with Reagan and Trump isn't that they were actors. The problem is that they were complete pieces of shit long before they were elected.

Actor-presidents have demonstrated a natural propensity for revolutionary disruption of entrenched attitudes. Reagan completely fucked over economic policy; Trump is completely fucking over the fundamental concept of democracy.

Imagine that same degree of revolutionary disruption moving us toward egalitarianism rather than corpo-fascism.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zelenski worked out pretty well for Ukraine.

He's not a saint, but he's been pretty damn good by understanding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] hatorade@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

And Newsom is different from Trump, how exactly? Dude hosted Charlie Kirk and Steve Banon on his podcast, that he wasn't required to do, and didn't question them, just nodded along like Joe Rogan.

Newsom is shaping up to be a DNC approved Trump at this rate. Loves Nazis, hates taxes, claims to love the real America, hated COVID protections being applied, doesn't care about brown people... Fucker needs to lose in the primary quickly. Assuming we get a fair one.

[–] VampirePenguin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If Newsom wins the primary, I'm out. I'd rather fight fascism on the streets than play this stupid ass good cop, bad cop game for another round. Fuck you, Democrats. Learn.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Fuck you sleeze bag

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Gonna have to change that stance if he wants to run on the Dem ticket in the year of our lord 2028.

Cuz everyone gonna be REAL fucking mad at billionaires by then if things keep going the way they are.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Dems rigged the election against Bernie to protect billionaires, then had a court declare that they were legally within their right to rig it. What makes you think they care how angry the average person is at their owners?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (12 children)

FINALLY. Someone thinking about the billionaires.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I wouldn't vote for Gavin if he was the Democratic candidate. He is just as horrible as the other Democrats.

We need true change and true leaders that will change the government to work for the working class instead of the wealthy.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›