this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
176 points (98.9% liked)

Linux

10322 readers
784 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the Linux Vendor Firmware Service serving more than 135 million downloads for Linux users updating their system and device firmware, LVFS has been working to get more hardware vendors to contribute either engineering resources or directly contributing annual dues as sponsors. Framework Computer is now the first one to have executed an agreement under these new sponsorship efforts.

Red Hat in employing lead developer Richard Hughes has contributed the most to LVFS/Fwupd's success, the Linux Foundation has also hosted the project since it has shifted into their umbrella, AMD's Mario Limonciello is among the significant contributors, and now Framework Computer is a new sponsor to the project.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You nor this article say wtf is LVFS

[–] wasabi@feddit.org 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A system to get firmware updates (BIOS, Touchpad and much more) like regular software updates on Linux.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I acquired a wds19 usb C dock for the mrs' macbook. I was plugged into it yesterday and did an apt upgrade, and it offered to update the firmware of the dock and the wireless mouse and keyboard.

No 500mb spyware tray applets, no .bin file on a sd card, no dos 6.2 live boot shenanigans.

The dell office machines and Mac could never dream of such power!

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's a Dell dock, isn't it? Dell PCs use the same system.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Yes, but the business I acquired it from must scrub that from their os image

[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Given the precedent with Framework: does somebody know if the maintainer of FWUpd is right-wing?

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What difference would that make? (I'm not familiar with the precedent, so probably missing some context)

[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 1 points 1 hour ago

It's to know whether it's still ethically safe to keep using FWUpd or not.

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This might be damage control

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Nah. They actually already were a sponsor of it before then. This article is just publishing old information.

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Who cares? I left the big tent a while ago.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I continue to contribute in the most minor way to both, and it's very true that Hughes LARGELY runs this repo. This is becoming a problem, especially since the majority of companies do not contribute, though they use the upstream just like everyone else.

If Amazon, Google, Dell, Hetzner, Equinox, DR, DO...etc all paid their fair share, they'd be able to pay honest contributors just simply for making what is already available MORE readily available. That's what this project is about.

On the hardware manufacturer side: AMD, Nvidia, Intel, Realtek...etc are also not chipping in.

This is a CRUCIAL project for larger adoption for home users. Yes, most enterprise-sized companies manage their own semver releases for firmware, but they still use these tools. They should contribute, not only because it's the right thing to do, but a miniscule amount of money for them to do so to ensure the same people making this such a success can continue to do so.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That's great to hear!

load more comments
view more: next ›