this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
424 points (81.8% liked)

Lefty Memes

6268 readers
444 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Agitprop (I.E. everything that would be more fitting on a poster than a meme) goes here.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Western perception of “Social credit” largely propaganda btw and if you believe it isnt then you got manipulated.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Both are bad and both countries are authoritarian shit holes

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Two things can suck at the same time.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

That's what he said! ... wait

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

With or without credit scores, banks are going to be assessing you for whether you're likely to pay back the loans they provide. Even if you deleted all credit scores overnight so everyone had to do individual assessments, you're still getting assessed and a credit score in all but name will emerge. If you're a high risk, banks will just put a big mark on your name that says "Don't lend to this person, they don't pay their debts" like they do in Austria.

The only real difference between the US Credit Score and the Chinese Social Credit is that the Chinese Social Credit takes other factors into account in whether you are considered worthy enough to have a loan, which isn't aaaall that different to how it's done in the UK, where registering to vote makes your credit score go up, but then again lenders in the UK don't tend to use credit scores for things like mortgages, they use their own checks.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

banks are going to be assessing you for whether you're likely to pay back the loans they provide

Actually, this is not quite accurate. It's more accurately a score that summarizes how much the banks would want to lend you money. It is designed to make sure you are profitable not just in your ability to simply pay back a loan, but also to make them money.

And, statistically, it's also systemically racist.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

It was systematically racist before credit scores as well. Before credit scores, whether you got a loan was dependent on the bank manager 'liking you', and by that I mean if you stepped into that room with skin any darker than the sheets the bank manager wore at the weekend, you weren't getting a loan.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The only time you need to borrow money from a bank is of you are buying a house, really. Remove the strong incentive to buy a place to live and then a credit score becomes a vague thing that only people working in finance know or care about.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

9/10 times yeah you're only really borrowing money from a bank for mortgages and that's the only loan you NEED to have. Otherwise there's credit cards, small business loans, car loans etc. You can probably get-by without those though.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Because our ssn was stolen many of times, our credit score was low even after we fought off all the charges and couldn’t get an apartment without a garentour. Moved to Spain and never needed a garentour or social check in basic necessities, hell we could go for a loan and the only thing judged is our reasoning. Slowly waiting for permanent residency and citizenship :)

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Isnt social credit system just a meme?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it effects a lot of ways in which you are allowed to live

[–] relianceschool@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure why you got a downvote, this is absolutely true. If you have a low SSC you may be subject to travel bans, reduced employment prospects, being barred from attending certain schools, increased surveillance and police monitoring, and public shaming. Other individuals can also have their scores lowered by interacting with you.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It's like that black mirror episode free fall

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So actually looked into the social credit system a while ago and it turns out a lot of it is myth and it seems to have been largely wound down after some abuse by some of the ?prefectures? where it was trialed and used to punish a few people (it was supposed to reward good behaviour by businesses and institutions apparently) but what remains did strike me as very similar to credit score, although it's maybe slightly more accountable? Maybe?

Anyway both seem dogshit, although a system verifying how organisations actually act (e.g. counter greenwashing and shit with hard evidence) would be cool if anyone could make it work.

[–] InevitableList@beehaw.org 1 points 13 hours ago

The ABC (Australian public broadcaster) did a thorough explainer debunking many of the myths around it recently.

Audio; https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/the-truth-about-chinas-social-credit-scores/106029740

Video; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps0Si4FhOPM

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

As usual, investigation into socialist practices reveals that the negative opinions held by the west are largely based on propaganda and lies.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 3 points 1 day ago

If you lack sufficient Internet points you cannot discuss that here.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 146 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I don't think many people in the West like credit score system either tbh

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Since this is an anarchist instance, I was willing to give OP the benefit of a doubt that this is against states in general but, alas, reading their comments it is whataboutism

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In another thread they were praising Stalin so I don’t think they deserve benefit of the doubt.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i'm getting close to blocking. their behavior i feel violates rule 6 (or 7 i can't see the sidebar on mobile) that users of this community should not deify past socialist experience. they have demonstrated a pattern of behavior that strongly favors imperialism with a veneer of leftist aesthetic. the mods ignoring this pattern in the face of reports has left a really bad taste in my mouth that's been slowly driving me away from dbzer0 and anarchist.nexus, two of my former favorite instances aside from my own here at slrpnk.net.

totalitarian authoritarian regimes are what socialism and communism are meant to be an alternative to, not something we should celebrate as long as they wear a red coat of paint. it's been very dissapointing as the rules of this communicate that this is supposed to be a generally left comm but more and more it's just !memes@lemmy.ml but on another instance

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

Yes I do feel leftymemes @ dbzer0 unfortunately has a sizeable ML influence.

The main mod of this community actually does some soviet union apologia I think. Which means the rules 6 basically isnt followed while they’re in charge.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 78 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Two things can be bad at the same time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] udc@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago
[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

What the fuck is this nonsense?

Nobody likes credit scores but it's at least marginally financial measurements that are used for financial decisions.

It's regressive, but only because our society is regressive. A middle class person who overspends and doesn't pay their bills on time is probably gonna get treated worse than a poor person who needs groceries and fails to pay their grocery bills on time, yes. But it's still financial.

The poor person isn't being stopped from buying a train ticket. They might not have money to do so, but that's a different societal fuck up.

At least compare apples to apples.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not to say credit scores are fun, but comparing the two is kinda absurd. Credit scores are calculated by private companies and used by banks to determine your eligibility for a loan. Essentially, it's an averaged history of how good you are at repaying debt, and it's used to determine if you will repay future debt. The people who calculate your score have no interest in how it affects you. The social credit system is a government score and has tons of things that can affect it, and there's plenty of opportunity for fudgery to screw you over. There are tons of ways in can negatively affect you. Worst of all, it can be used to deny international flights, and in effect your ability to escape the system. Since this is actually run by the government, it creates an avenue for punishing political dissent and control that just doesn't exist with credit scores.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right in the first half, extremely wrong in the second half (But you should be forgiven, we all get heavily propagandized about this stuff). What we know of the Chinese "social credit" score in the west is largely a tall tale / myth. Here, from the top of the English wikipedia article about the Chinese system:

There has been a widespread misconception that China operates a nationwide and unitary social credit "score" based on individuals' behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low. Media reports in the West have sometimes exaggerated or inaccurately described this concept.[4][5][6] In 2019, the central government voiced dissatisfaction with pilot cities experimenting with social credit scores. It issued guidelines clarifying that citizens could not be punished for having low scores and that punishments should only be limited to legally defined crimes and civil infractions. As a result, pilot cities either discontinued their point-based systems or restricted them to voluntary participation with no major consequences for having low scores.[4][7] According to a February 2022 report by the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), a social credit "score" is a myth as there is "no score that dictates citizen's place in society".[4]

It's still a credit score system, so it's still one of those dumb monolithic systems a large authoritarian country implements when it can't be bothered to keep track of it's citizens on a qualitative level - Like FICO in the US - But it doesn't leak outside of that context in the way we westerners are told. In fact, our myths about that probably came out of the incidents in 2019 when the central government tamped down on local abuses of the system.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 1 day ago

The main difference is that credit score exists while the Chinese social score doesn't.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

The Social Credit doesn't exist, FICO does. One has more impact because it's real.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

The US has both:

The Chinese Social Credit score is where your Facebook and other social media are scoured by HR before you are hired. But if you are rich, your Facebook posts don't matter because your Dad made you an executive the company.

A Credit Score is pure capitalism. You can be a racist asshole and get the best deal from banks because you have money.

China is no different with their Princeling "Fuerdai".

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So credit scores are... good?

I hate you.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Could at least argue credit shows your payment history and debt to income ratio, social credit score could be literally anything. Both can suck at the same time.

759 credit score. Still don't qualify.

load more comments
view more: next ›