this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
398 points (94.6% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

19027 readers
261 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The people who hate it are those who think themselves better than their peers. They think they deserve more than their peers, and that socialism transfers their superior effort to the benefit of their inferiors.

They see socialism not as everyone helping everyone, but as they, the successful being forced to support them, the lazy.

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Yes. My one note would be that it may be more to the root of it to say that they see it as the good (anything they like) having to help the bad (anything else). These sorts almost always reduce down to good/bad, me/them, clean/dirty because they (like all of us in our own ways) simply desire understanding and the surety it provides. Framing things as 0/1 is much easier to understand than actually facing the grey of reality. It's easy to want easy. Not often good or helpful, but just so dang easy to abide by.

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The most common gripe I hear is that because not all labor is similar[EG: Healthcare vs Mining] there is no easy way to make sure that people are putting in the same value into the system. For people that already mistakenly believe there is a large group of "lazy immigrants" draining resources in the current system, this is a deal breaker. The internal logic isn't too much to swallow its just a hurdle to get people to sit long enough to hear the answer. They would rather fight over the crumbs than share the whole because somehow thats more "fair".

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Propaganda.

People don't know what socialism actually means because of propaganda...

you can ask someone who is against "socialism" whether they like it by talking about elements of it without explicitly mentioning the word "socialism" and they will probably agree with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There are various kinds of socialism. Some "take care of themselves and neighbors" & some merely claim to.

One of the merely claims types is authoritarian socialism, which includes Marxism–Leninism.

Authoritarian socialism, or socialism from above, is an economic and political system supporting some form of socialist economics while rejecting political pluralism. As a term, it represents a set of economic-political systems describing themselves as "socialist" and rejecting the liberal-democratic concepts of multi-party politics, freedom of assembly, habeas corpus, and freedom of expression, either due to fear of counter-revolution or as a means to socialist ends.

That ideology does not respect & protect inherent individual rights & liberties recognized since the Enlightenment. Authoritarian socialism is hated for abusing human rights, and it's often incorrectly assumed that all socialism is authoritarian. That explains the hatred.

Kinds of socialism that respect & protect human rights do exist, however, and they have a better claim to a system of self & mutual care. There's little reason to hate those.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

It's mostly thanks to USA propaganda and the whole "Red Scare" that began in the 1950s

I mean doesn't it mean a system where the people take care of themselves and neighbors?

Not really, the system is supposed to be about a government and economy that cares about the well being of its people first, such that several wealth distribution methods would be applied to ensure minimal inequality.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago

IMHO remnants from the cold war indoctrination.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People don't really like change.

Think about free public libraries. They're fairly popular, and not controversial outside of fringe libertarian types and assholes. People like that you can borrow books and other media for free. Usually there's a bit of a backlash if there's a movement to shut down libraries or limit their services.

Imagine if free public libraries didn't exist, and someone tried to invent them today. People would be having screaming fits about communism. It's stealing from the authors. it's ruining publishing. We don't need tax dollars for this when we have amazon. Blah blah blah.

It's the same with other things we could socialize. health care is a privatized nightmare. If we somehow got a public option in, eventually people would start reflexively defending it.

So what I'm saying is many people don't really have a set of internally consistent beliefs. They just don't like change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a hilarious place to come ask this lol

Nothing is wrong with socialism except that maybe it doesn't go far enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wischi@programming.dev 73 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably US-Americans confusing anything that's not predatory capitalism with Russia and China.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Confusing or deliberately conflating, depending on whether they're the fraudster or the mark.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, its means workers control the means of production.

Edit: Im getting really tired of people conflating socialism with social programs. Its not socialism when the government does something, stop saying it is.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Only if you're in the military or a billionaire.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

People often confuse socialism with communism. The confusion is deliberate by a lot of right wing propaganda. When talking about socialism with Americans, you have to explain to them that the fire department is an example of socialism. As are other public services, like roads, police, libraries, and some utilities.

Of course in America, some people think profit is more important, so they are doing everything they can to privatize services. For example, in Texas they are slowly killing public education, and toll roads have taken over normal highway construction.

As I mentioned, people are being conned and scared of the word so that they will elect people will be replacing what remains of public services with private ones.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pipi1234@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (8 children)

One reason I can think is we haven't yet seen a working socialist society, which often fail for external reasons.

For example, the socialist government in Cuba was severely undermined by the USA imposed blockade.

A more recent example is Venezuela, while you can think what you want about its current government, I don't think USA should interfere with any sovereign nation.

There's almost like a pattern, like someone, somewhere doesn't like the idea of socialism to succeed.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China needs Taiwan to fail because the Chinese Communist Party maintains that democracy is incompatible with the Chinese culture. Having a very successful Chinese democracy shows that Chinese culture is compatible with democracy.

In a similar way, capitalists do everything they can to scuttle socialist countries, because a working socialist country would show that it was viable. Hence endless embargoes, wars, and a steady stream of propaganda. This was true for the entire life of the Soviet Union, and continues to this day for socialist countries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BigMike@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Well, over here hard-line socialism is tied directly to Soviet attempts of taking away our independence through military force after us being occupied for well over a thousand years.

So yeah, a hard sell. But we have softer socialist policies these days, but I don't see a shift towards a fully socialist system.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the argument against it that I see the most is that governments are inherently corruptible and bad at managing taxpayer money and so it's destined to become a big scam.

fair enough, to be honest

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 5 points 1 day ago

yeah but it does that shit anyway under Capitalism. XD

[–] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago

ELI5

People dislike socialism because they often feel like their hard work and effort does not get fairly rewarded. Why would you work your whole life away to become a doctor and save lives when someone else wastes their time lost in vice.

Well you're 5 you piece of shit and your efforts at not pissing the bed have been pretty minimal at best. But do you still eat? Do you have a roof and a bed to piss all over? Who cleans that mess every time? People hate socialism because it sucks to be the provider. It also sucks to suffer. And in life we often forget this. We forget it takes all of us. We forget what it is to be helpless. We forget those who provided for us. And we get angry when we have to provide for others when we feel so left out of the party.

In short dont forget. Don't forget what you have been given and don't forget to share. Dumb kids.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 27 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Socialism is great as a concept, basically means putting people before capital. Capitalism is the reverse. Even the staunchest capitalist countries practice socialism to some degree. Raw capitalism would be hell.

It’s the same with communism, where the workers were supposed to own the means of production, which means money wouldn’t gravitate around a few ones. Even the staunchest communist countries didn’t practice real communism, deforming it into feudalism.

TL;DR: Socialism is a great concept, just consider that everything we hear about it comes from a culture ruled by capitalists.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's manufactured hate.

It benefits those in power to make average citizens fear socialism.

We already live in a system with numerous socialist programs. Many of the people who have been brainwashed to hate the concept of socialism already benefit from some of these socialist programs.

As with pretty much everything in life, you have to find a happy medium. That goes for socialism too. A full on 100% socialist society may not function well. Just like how we're witnessing the failures of the ultra-capitalist society we live in.

But the brainwashed don't want to meet in the middle. They fear socialism and don't want any trace of it in our society....despite the fact that there are already many socialist aspects present.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›