I'm aware of the create-instance-plugin.
My question is: why objects can't be used in a generator? I've tried several methods, but it seems impossible. What if I have a JSON object and want to use it in my generator?
This is a Lemmy Community for perchance.org, a platform for sharing and creating random text generators.
Feel free to ask for help, share your generators, and start friendly discussions at your leisure :)
This community is mainly for discussions between those who are building generators. For discussions about using generators, especially the popular AI ones, the community-led Casual Perchance forum is likely a more appropriate venue.
See this post for the Complete Guide to Posting Here on the Community!
1. Please follow the Lemmy.World instance rules.
2. Be kind and friendly.
3. Be thankful to those who try to help you.
4. Only post about stuff related to perchance.
5. Refrain from requesting Prompts for the AI Tools.
text-to-image-plugin and ai-text-plugin) e.g. "What is the good prompt for X?", "How to achieve X with Y generator?"6. Search through the Community Before Posting.
I'm aware of the create-instance-plugin.
My question is: why objects can't be used in a generator? I've tried several methods, but it seems impossible. What if I have a JSON object and want to use it in my generator?
Can you share a minimal example of what you've tried?
I think you might be running into the issue where you need to wrap your object in parentheses, like this? foo = [({abc:123})] See the meta:tags lines in https://perchance.org/t2i-styles#edit for an example.
You only need to do that if you're creating an object within square brackets without assigning it to a variable within those brackets. E.g. you can just write [foo={abc:123}] since the equals sign forces the JavaScript engine to interpret it as an object.
The reason for this weirdness is technical - related to how JavaScript engines evaluate stuff. Basically, {abc:123} on its own (without parentheses or variable assignment) is interpreted as a block scope with a label.
when will 768x1024 resolution stuff be available someday? @perchance