this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
133 points (88.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42908 readers
932 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes. Buried in the settings there's an option to disable it

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Is that a unique tracking link? It looks more like a regular short link. I call fake news on this one.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there's no reason to use a "short" link when it's longer than the real "long" link

[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps, but that does not mean it's not the case.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

if i see domain.tld/garbage i have to assume they did it for tracking, not the opposite or for "shortening" it

[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, that's wrong. All url shorteners work exactly like that. How did you get the initial link anyway?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

What do you mean? This is supposed to be sent to my friends. To a friend, a real message would be like "I'm using Firefox, get it at firefox.com" and not "I'm using Firefox, get it at domain.tld/garbage".

This time the "short" link isn't unique, but they still did this for tracking purposes and not for "convenience". I didn't check it but it will definitely resolve to something like hxxp://Firefox.domain ?utm_source=whatsapp&utm_medium=message&utm_campaign=promo&utm_id=wa-spam&utm_term=share&utm_content=click for maximum tracking analysis

Edit: TIL Lemmy automatically removes tracking tags from URLs... I had to type again my delicious tracking link...

Edit2: Lemmy removes tracking tags even from code blocks 😲

Edit3: Lemmy removes tracking tags even with an invalid protocol

Edit4: Lemmy removes tracking tags even with invalid TLD

[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's a helpful analysis! So there is zero tracking in there. It is just anonymous measurement of a campaign, which is perfectly fine. It is NOT person specific.

What i didn't understand is if this link to Firefox was inserted by you at all. It looks like it was appended to a completely unrelated link that you wanted to share. So Firefox hijacked your message to insert a second link. Is that correct? Because that would infuriate me. I found this seeing in my Firefox and it defaulted to be active.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yes, Firefox detected that I shared to Whatsapp, then added the second link at the end of my message. I was pissed

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What is your "privacy" browser... And how did you disable this?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It's Firefox, and there's a new "sharing" option in the menu that contains a toggle to disable this

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

How exactly are you getting these in the first place? I just tried to share the url but it didn't do anything odd.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] dabster291@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Thanks! I like their limitations page

[–] CaptSatelliteJack@lemy.lol 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's Waterfox as well, but I still prefer Librewolf.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Why's that? Asking as a Firefox user.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this happen when you copypaste the URL?

Because messing with the clipboard is a really scary thing.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

There's a ESR release.

[–] solomonschuler@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't use Firefox, as in, don't use the official Mozilla release, even that has gone to shit. Pretty much everything has gone to shit, in terms of search results and web browsers. I use librewolf (a fork of firefox) on my laptop and Ironfox on my phone they both by default come with the security features by default. No AI generation built in the browser, no Firefox suggestions, no tracking, none of it. I've also stopped using standard search engines like google or DDG and replaced it with marginalia search. This combination has allowed me to eliminate AI generated content and tracking from my browsing experience.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

DDG tracks its users? Is there any definitive proof of this?

[–] dusty_raven@discuss.online 1 points 5 hours ago

https://factually.co/fact-checks/technology/does-duckduckgo-track-you-809f45

https://blog.ssuiteoffice.com/articles/general/duckduckgo-privacy-controversy.htm

tldr; DDG specifically allows Microsoft, a company that profits from collecting specific user data, to collect some (anonymous) user data through its ad program.

I don't think it's proven that DDG creates user profiles like Google does, more that there is a concern that they receive their money from Microsoft, or that they have agreements with Microsoft to send them any data in the first place.

[–] nocksock@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Firefox is no longer a privacy browser.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Besides tor, known any other alternatives?

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 12 points 2 days ago

Femnec on mobile, Librewolf on desktop

[–] Morphite88@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 days ago

Cromite, Fennec

I mean, something like Lynx is probably as private as you get. Might be lacking a few features like, anything graphical. Still relatively usable imo

[–] YgestWefsid@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Here is an option for you to anonymously browse, but you will have to let us know where you are going first" type anonymity.

Edit: I forgot to tell anonymity and privacy are two different things. Just telling it because some people might think they serve the same purpose.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 days ago

I like the duckduckgo browser