To spare you the read:
The article does not answer the question from its headline.
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)
Independent Media
88 readers
46 users here now
Independent Journalism* from around the world.
Rules:
-
Posts should link to a current* article from an independent media source. If there's a paywall please put the official link in the URL box and add an archive link in the text body of your post.
-
Post title should be the article headline or best fit. Please tag if a sign-in is required.
-
No misinformation or bigotry.
-
Be civil. Be cool. Instance rules apply.
-
Tag NSFW at your discretion.
*Independent journalism is generally free from government and corporate interests and is not controlled by a major media conglomerate. Use your best judgement when posting.
*Current depends on whether new, publicly available information has been released since the article has last been updated. When in doubt please add the publication date to the title in a tag [like this.]
For a less serious random news feed, check out: https://sh.itjust.works/c/wildfeed
Both communities were created with the goal of increasing media pluralism. Feel free to share if you have comments or ideas related to eitther community.
founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
It does. It doesn't give one answer since the author explains it's an example of semiotic covergence.
It describes the different ways the same symbol evolved to have similar meanings across cultures.
No, it theorizes how that might be the cause without giving any evidence apart from some anecdotal stuff, which is mostly not even directly connected to the topic.
The mentioned camera symbol theory looks much more likely to me (it predates Japanese SLRs by the way, I own a 60's German compact camera that uses it for far focus setting and it has been a thing before).
But that is also just a theory without real evidence.
I think the article is neither a good one about semiotic convergence, nor about that part of internet history.
I disagree. I found it interesting on the topic of symbolism, as the author explains environmental symbolism is the lens through which he's viewing.
He's tracking a modern archetype, so the cultural references are evidence enough. Kinda like the "Cool S," some symbols don't have clear origins. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool_S
I agree it would be more interesting to know the exact thought process of the designers and track the dissemination of the image. I couldn't find anything like that, so if you have more sources, feel free to share.