The problem with structuralism is that it overvalues language. Structuralists seem to forget that words are signfiers and signs of meaning, not the source of meaning.
The word "car" points to all kinds of meaning, but you can't drive it home.
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
5 points (85.7% liked)
Philosophy
1681 readers
1 users here now
Discussion of philosophy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nice name
Structuralists seem to forget that words are signfiers and signs of meaning, not the source of meaning
Wouldn't that only apply to ontic structuralists? They say the structures themselves are the real things. But epistemic structuralists merely say that the kind of knowledge we can have about reality is structural knowledge (but the world itself might be full of non-structural objects).