this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
195 points (100.0% liked)

Traditional Art

6057 readers
1 users here now

From dabblers to masters, obscure to popular and ancient to futuristic, this is an inclusive community dedicated to showcasing all types of art by all kinds of artists, as long as they're made in a traditional medium

'Traditional' here means 'Physical', as in artworks which are NON-DIGITAL in nature.

What's allowed: Acrylic, Pastel, Encaustic, Gouache, Oil and Watercolor Paintings; Ink Illustrations; Manga Panels; Pencil and Charcoal sketches; Collages; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood Prints; Pottery; Ceramics; Metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; weaving; Qulting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

What's not allowed: Digital art (anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs) or AI art (anything made with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney or other models)


make sure to check the rules stickied to the top of the community before posting.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Screenshot_20251012-024236_SubstackScreenshot_20251012-024244_Substack

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I've never seen these Klimt birch works.

Thank you.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Dear lord, Klimt’s stuff is unsettling. (Most of it)

[–] shane@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Interesting. I've never thought of his work as unsettling.

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Interesting, I found his theme selection and overall style to be the exact opposite. Goya's black paintings, now that's unsettling...

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't look that much surreal to me!

[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Despite being rather flat the textures (esp the tree bases) come off as very real. It's a bit unsettling really. Well done Gustav.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Personally I like them, but am left wondering if he ever really mastered light & shade.

Indeed, I'm not sure he ever really needed to, based on his main body of work.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He did, just didn't stylistically utilize it. Like Picasso abandoning all traditional techniques despite being an expert at it

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you know of any particular examples? (of Klimt's light & shadow work)

Screenshot_20251012-113430_Arts & Culture

Blind man, 1896.

Portrait work he did early career but work he still highly valued.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Screenshot_20251012-113643_Arts & Culture

Portrait of an old man, 1896.

These could've been a post of their own lol

Edit. Looks a bit like professor McGonagall. (Forgot her real name)

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cool! Thanks for sharing those!

There was a period he was training to be an art teacher and made a lot of academic paintings. He also became a historical painter par excellence. This obviously involved the more traditional academic style. Like his male nude for example.

Will now mostly be posting on !visualarts@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Come join the comm ❤️