this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
140 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26499 readers
1785 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally, after nine months of Donald Trump running rampant over much in the government they hold dear, Democrats in Congress have found the ground on which to fight.

Pressed to vote for a Republican plan to keep the government open through mid-November, Democrats balked, and instead laid out a series of demands that amounted to the undoing of much of what the GOP has accomplished over the past year.

It was a nonstarter for Republicans and, after days of bluster and fruitless voting, the government tipped into a shutdown just after midnight on Wednesday. For Democrats, that may have been the point – pummeled by voters last November, the party has been looking for opportunities to remake its case to Americans.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Hey y'all, if you see ICE, remind them it's their own cult leaders withholding their paychecks from them while asking them to stand out in the street and catch hate from their fellow citizens.

Man, punching themselves in the dick to own the libs.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I keep seeing people saying ICE salary is on hold, but I doubt Trump would do that even if it’s true. They’ll find a way to fund his SS.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

You doubt that Donald Trump would stiff his own workers?

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

ICE has an exception and is still funded

Correction: see below

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope, "ICE agents also go without pay." (arc). The exception ICE gets is that they have to keep working while they're not being paid.

Ah thanks for correction

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Considering how much the GOP fucked up nearly every good thing in our government, and how ICE is acting like the hillbilly gastapo...

Like, yeah. Keep it shut down indefinitely. Can they do that? Will/can the oompa loompa just fuck up more laws, or is this a solution to one side of the government completely ignoring and harming over half the country?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They might have found it, but i fear they are too stupid (the party, not the voters) to both keep it up long enough, and to explain it to the people that the fault 100% lies with the GOP. They are prone to trip over their own tongues while the GOP happily blames the Dems as the sole reason for the shutdown.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Absolutely agreed. This shutdown was inevitable and a savvy messenger would have been preparing the public for it for months already. Every day reminding the public that MAGA doesn't have a plan and only wants power to enrich themselves and their corrupt billionaire regime. Instead they seem to have an absolutely moronic view that 'actions speak louder than words' which was never true, and even less true in today's media environment. Meanwhile MAGA understands and is running laps around them with messaging. Schumer and Jeffries need to step aside NOW and get someone who knows how to communicate in charge.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Quite frankly I feel like the media tilts too far right to get their message out anyway.

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 months ago

I state again - remake your case next year. If you can campaign rightly and focus on the ISSUES and what MATTERS instead of wasting your time bashing Trump because that has gone on soooo well last year. Then make it.

But if you're gonna just pummel Trump then waste your time, continue draining what little faith people have in your camp.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Call, don't email or use the feedback forum, to your Democratic senators because you know that most of them are weak-willed individuals that run off of ego and being liked and to unfortunately help them have the mental and moral fortitude to continue to stand up for what's actually right.

Are they going to demand an end to fundion Zionist terror groups, ice, churches, and the domestic repression tools of the military? To save money and keep taxes down?

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Here's my problem. What are Democrats looking to get from this? All I've heard is ACA subsidies. Extending the subsidies is a bandaid that I guarantee Republicans would absolutely love to be "forced" to implement. If they just drop 15 million poor folks (many of whom likely voted Republican) from Medicaid, and double the price of ACA healthcare for another 15 million, those poor constituents might take notice while Republicans continue to skullfuck the American healthcare system.

Alright, so let's say they win some concessions. This administration has been given a green light by the current sham of a Supreme Court to undermine and ignore Congress's ability to control the budget via "pocket rescission". The administration can just... not spend the money as it was appropriated by Congress. A budget passing Congress for X spending on Y doesn't mean that X will be spent on Y if the Trump administration doesn't want to.

Why make a deal if the other side has been blessed with the ability to legally ignore it?