this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
330 points (96.9% liked)

Privacy

4205 readers
73 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello guys, today I wanted to talk about a project I deeply care about and I'm actively contributing to, as I believe its good for everyone, including privacy concerned users

Ladybird Browser

This browser comes from the project "SerenityOS", and has since evolved and separated from it. The founders are Andreas Kling, and Chris Wanstrath. The main goal of this project is to create a browser from scratch, avoiding chromium, gecko, etc. The main keypoints that should be of interest for Privacy Oriented Users are the following:

  • Ladybird lead (Andreas Kling) states "We're not monetizing users, in any way. This is uncharted territory for browsers. So we're not going to do any default search deals. We're not going to do cryptocurrencies or try to monetize user data, just sponsorships and donations"

  • While** Ladybird will implement current web standards including cookie handling and tracking mechanisms for compatibility**, the browser's philosophy puts the user in control of these decisions, not the company. The browser won't have built-in incentives to encourage data collection since it doesn't profit from it.

  • It aims to be "free from advertising's influence" Ladybird, representing a shift away from the current web ecosystem where users like us are the product. This allows the project to implement privacy features without worrying about harming advertising partners or revenue streams.

As of now, the project has hired several developers with money coming from donations, from partners such as FUTO, Shopify, Cloudflare, among many, and is also seeing lots of volunteer activity on github. So well, if you like the web having more diversity and us having another alternative to google, check them out https://ladybird.org/

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sounds cool! Is it in a useful state?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pfr@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's so far from being ready. I built it on void recently and well, it ran, but it was very bare bones. At this stage I still prefer netsurf.

Looking forward to the finished product.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is this the browser with the terfy devs

[–] Fugit@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's it. And it seems like they don't stop at "mere" transphobia: https://mastodon.social/@alatiera/115272605624599561

Edit: Browsing by "active" threads, I didn't see that this one was two weeks old. Oh well 😅

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if you want a browser made by a transphobe just use brave

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lovely way of taking everything out of context

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd be curious to know what the proper context is for Kling saying that using gender neutral language in the documentation of a project he was maintaining is something he's opposed to because it's "ideologically motivated."

White males are actively discriminated against in tech.

It’s an open secret of Silicon Valley.

One of the last meetings I attended before leaving Apple (in 2017) was management asking us to “keep the corporate diversity targets in mind” when interviewing potential new hires.

The phrasing was careful, but the implication was pretty clear.

I knew in my heart this wasn’t wholesome, but I was too scared to rock the boat at the time.

That's Kling replying to @danheld, who "is ultimately responding to @shaunmmaguire’s tweet lying about being told he wouldn’t be promoted at Google for being white."

What's the proper context for that?

What's the proper context for Kling calling someone getting dragged for boosting noted far-right conspiracy nut Bryan Lunduke "persecution" for "banal, mainstream positions"?

I mean, sure, being alt-right isn't very alt nowadays so I guess it's mainstream, I'll grant you that.

Quotes and links from this blog post

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›