this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

CSCareerQuestions

1183 readers
19 users here now

A community to ask questions about the tech industry!

Rules/Guidelines

Related Communities

Credits

Icon base by Skoll under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Every developer (~400) has a Copilot license of which about 50% are actively using it (we'll start pruning licenses next month).

My experience so far is that it's biggest benefit is writing tests and refactoring code. The major downside is that it has a habit of introducing very subtle bugs that are easy to miss even with human review.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literally zero and a large chunk of the people you know have most likely actively used the software the company makes for more than an hour a day (pretty much regardless of country). If not, its replaced by software that serves the same goal from a different provider. The teams we work with are equally not using it.

AI is not the future. It is not a tool worthy of use, and it is a major distraction from growing your skills. Especially if you are junior.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't know a single person who uses it, neither privately nor professionally. We don't do much boilerplate and write a bunch of stuff that would take longer to describe in a prompt than write itself.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

why do some people post this link at the end of their comments?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

To state that their content as posted is covered by that license.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not at all in my org, as far as I know. We are a team of senior engineers somewhat set in our ways and I am not sure how good Copilot plugin for Emacs is.

We are part of a large company and we had a mandate from up top to come up with ways to incorporate AI into our product. We prototyped a few, but could never get it batter than "almost good enough to be useful". Other teams have presented promising prototypes of inhouse AI assistants that we can incorporate into products.

My team pivoted to the inverse: seeing if we can make our product more useful to ML developers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

seeing if we can make our product more useful to ML developers.

Nice. I've heard the folks selling gold digging supplies were the biggest winners in the gold rush.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not at all, officially speaking; giant corporation BTW. Biggest reason is that security and data governance is still figuring out which ones they can run on-prem to prevent any data from being copied to a non-EU server (preferrably no external server at all). Github Copilot is giant no-no, MS Copilot may be an option. We'll see.

AI is the future BTW, providing massive worth. It's a great tool to increase your abilities and skill , to be able to provide a fuckton of value within a short time, instead of having to wait for people to grow into their job. Especially if you are junior.