this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
612 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1833 readers
563 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 20 hours ago (16 children)

Maybe I'm just getting old, but I honestly can't think of any practical use case for AI in my day-to-day routine.

ML algorithms are just fancy statistics machines, and to that end, I can see plenty of research and industry applications where large datasets need to be assessed (weather, medicine, ...) with human oversight.

But for me in my day to day?

I don't need a statistics bot making decisions for me at work, because if it was that easy I wouldn't be getting paid to do it.

I don't need a giant calculator telling me when to eat or sleep or what game to play.

I don't need a Roomba with a graphics card automatically replying to my text messages.

Handing over my entire life's data just so a ML algorithm might be able to tell me what that one website I visited 3 years ago that sold kangaroo testicles was isn't a filing system. There's nothing I care about losing enough to go the effort of setting up copilot, but not enough to just, you know, bookmark it, or save it with a clear enough file name.

Long rant, but really, what does copilot actually do for me?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Our boss all but ordered us to have IT set this shit up on our PCs. So far I've been stalling, but I don't know how long I can keep doing it.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 19 hours ago

Tell your boss you talked to legal and they caution that all copilot data is potentially discoverable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

Set it up. People have to find out by themselves.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

same here, i mostly dont even use it on the phone. my bro is into it thought, thinking ai generate dpicture is good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's a fun party trick for like a second, but at no point today did I need a picture of a goat in a sweater smoking three cigarettes while playing tic-tac-toe with a llama dressed as the Dalai Lama.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The only feature that actually seems useful for on-device AI is voice to text that doesn't need an Internet connection.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

As someone who hates orally dictating my thoughts, that's a no from me dawg, but I can kinda understand the appeal (though I'll note offline TTS has been around for like a decade pre-AI)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 22 hours ago

I would actively avoid the extra hassle of an AI computer.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My problem is that it's not that fucking useful. I got the Pixel 9 specifically because of its advertised AI chip for the assistant and I swear it's just gotten worse since the Pixel 7. I used to be able to ask Google anything through the assistant, and now 90% of my questions are answered with "can't find the information."

They also advertised (or at least heavily alluded to) the use of the AI chip when you are in low network areas but it works just as good outside of 4g+ coverage as it ever did without the stupid chip.

Whats the point of adding AI branded nonsense if there's no practical use for it. And that doesn't even start to cover the issues with AI's reliability as a source of information. Garbage in = garbage out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

When Gemini can find the information, they added flowery "social" bullshit before, in the middle and after the information I asked for wasting my time

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

i dint get a pixel for that reason after PIxel 5a died, the exonys chip is significantly weaker than other flagship phones, and they sacrificed thier battery power/efficiency capacity since 5A(which was a very defective phone) just to prop up AI.

We know google was saving money on not using QUALCOMM/snapdragon chips, which most others are using. AI is just thier excuse so they can put less effort into making quality product.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's not fair! I care! A lot!

Just had to buy a new laptop for new place of employment. It took real time, effort, and care, but I've finally found a recent laptop matching my hardware requirements and sense of aesthetics at a reasonable price, without that hideous copilot button :)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Which laptop did you buy if you don't mind sharing?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

quite annoyed that the Snapdragon laptops are bootlocked cos they'd make great Linux boxes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Gen AI should be private, secure, local and easier to train by it's users to fit their own needs. Closest thing to this at the moment seems to be Kobold.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 219 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No thanks. I’m perfectly capable of coming up with incorrect answers on my own.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 21 hours ago

Don’t care AND are not stupid.

[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even non tech people I talk to know AI is bad because the companies are pushing it so hard. They intuit that if the product was good, they wouldn't be giving it away, much less begging you to use it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago

customers dont want AI, but only thhe corporation heads seem obssed with it.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're right - and even if the user is not conscious of this observation, many are subconsciously behaving in accordance with it. Having AI shoved into everything is offputting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago

Oh we care alright. We care about keeping it OUT of our FUCKING LIVES.

[–] [email protected] 114 points 1 day ago (11 children)

One of the mistakes they made with AI was introducing it before it was ready (I’m making a generous assumption by suggesting that “ready” is even possible). It will be extremely difficult for any AI product to shake the reputation that AI is half-baked and makes absurd, nonsensical mistakes.

This is a great example of capitalism working against itself. Investors want a return on their investment now, and advertisers/salespeople made unrealistic claims. AI simply isn’t ready for prime time. Now they’ll be fighting a bad reputation for years. Because of the situation tech companies created for themselves, getting users to trust AI will be an uphill battle.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Apple Intelligence and the first versions of Gemini are the perfect examples of this.

iOS still doesn’t do what was sold in the ads, almost a full year later.

Edit: also things like email summary don’t work, the email categories are awful, notification summaries are straight up unhinged, and I don’t think anyone asked for image playground.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Insert 'Full Self Driving' Here.

Also, outlook's auto alt text function told me that a conveyor belt was a picture of someone's screen today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

WTF is an AI computer? Is that some marketing bullshit?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago

"Y2k ready" vibes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The average technical person realises ai is shit.
The average non-technical person doesn't need an ai computer, because chatgpt is free.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

not exactly true on the 2nd one, just because cpgt exist is not the reason an average person believes they dont need AI. they know AI is shit from the get-go, doesnt take a programming genius to realizing, when you know that only the corporations are the only ones obsessed with it, and it hadnt produced any valuble product.

and then had to deal with many AI system, like chat boxes, or google searches,, especially on reddit.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

I care. I care enough to crater copilot.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›