this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
445 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15013 readers
1164 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally found on privacy@lemmy.ml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

If it makes you feel better, EVs aren't a real solution to the problems we face anyways, public transport was always the solution and EVs was a way to get consumers to keep focusing on individualism and consumerism to solve societal problems.

Edit: So many replies falling over themselves about how EVs are a good "baby step". They're not. Hydrogen fuel cells is a good baby step. EVs are still extremely extractivist. Lithium batteries are very bad, environmentally speaking. Hydrogen is significantly cleaner. It is avoided because it would require unprofitable infrastructure to be rolled out to support hydrogen vehicles.

[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am 100% in favor of density, non-car-centric urban development, active mobility and rock-solid public transit -- I am on this community for a reason, after all, and I further do not drive. But I acknowledge that there are some cases where cars are important for trade work, hauling, etc., as well as where buses are the better option for transit, and in those cases I believe that the vehicle should be electrified. It may only be like 5% of the solution, but it's a part of the solution nevertheless.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

More of a tram person instead of buses for transit due to how much more comfortable of a ride it is. Everything else I fully agree with though

Open Source Electric vehicles here we come!

[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

I generally prefer trams and light rail to buses, but buses do offer a lot of flexibility that can be useful in any transit system. I do think that right now they're often not given appropriate priority and used for routes that should be run by trams or light rail though.

load more comments (4 replies)