this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
205 points (99.0% liked)

Linux

14168 readers
217 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Which is why LMDE exists.

~~Too bad LMDE is based on Sid. Some stuff can break on occasion.~~

I few months ago I helped an older lady at a repair café to replace her Win10 with LMDE (because that's what she wanted). Installed just fine but didn't boot after reboot. Installed LMDE 2 or 3 additional times, to make sure I didn't overlook something. Same result.

Then installed Fedora and it just worked.

[–] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

LMDE is not based on Sid, it's based on Debian Stable. LMDE 7 is currently based on Debian 13 Trixie. You sure you had the right ISO?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

LMDE is not based on Sid, it’s based on Debian Stable

Oh wow, you're right. Did that change at some point and I just didn't pay attention? My bad!

You sure you had the right ISO?

I had the correct ISO and the experience with the lady's notebook was as described. Maybe the notebook needed newer kernel code?

[–] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's always been based on stable, AFAIK.

Maybe the notebook needed newer kernel code?

If it was able to boot the Live USB to install it, I figure that means the kernel is new enough to actually run the laptop properly. I can only guess something in the installer itself was messing up somehow? Or perhaps it wasn't making an entry in the boot table? That's an odd one for sure.

load more comments (2 replies)