this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2369 readers
78 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (16 children)

All the venture capitalists who got scammed into funding this:

space is cold

"Data centers on hard mode" is such a good way to put it.

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

@burble @techtakes

Why not submerge them in a river for far less money.

Microsoft had an underwater datacenter-in-a-container test a while back.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Underwater datacenters make cooling very effective and maintenance nearly impossible, so you have to treat the container data centers essentially disposable. That's only viable with economy of scale big enough to be an xkcd comic punchline. I guess Microsoft found that even they are not quite there yet. Also most computers don't tolerate seawater quite as well as they tolerate air.

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@bitofhope

Pretty sure space datacenters are also going to be even more disposable.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

Oh yea absolutely. Underwater datacenters have one upside (cooling) and massive downsides (everything else, more or less). Space datacenters trade that upside into yet another downside, make the downsides even bigger and add a few extra downsides for good measure.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

imagine a $100b GPU data centre with the disposability of a cubesat

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)