this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
49 points (88.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12758 readers
1188 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

Without playing/seeing what Horses is like, it's difficult to evaluate Valve's decision.

That being said there is tons of weird and fucked up NSFW stuff on Steam.

Banning a transgressive game seemingly without any explicit content seems excessive.

From my perspective, this is another reason it's a bad idea to have an American company (even a somewhat user-focused one like Valve) be a steward of modern digital services. Local culture puts too much emphasis on the theatrical elements of morality. Not to mention the challenges faced by the locals in areas such as corruption and rule of law (Valve trying to cheat on refunds, adding mandatory arbitration clauses, Soviet-style kangaroo courts essentially, and operating unlicensed gambling schemes).

[–] Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It was rejected because in the build they submitted for review a minor was riding a naked person with a horse mask and valve saw that as sexual which i find fair considering ponyplay being a thing. I understand valve wanting to distance themselves from anything involving a minor that could be seen as sexual

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The issue with the child was fixed in a later build. A build that Valve doesn’t want to review.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You are really giving off "it's not pedophilia, it's hebephilia" vibes here...

Yes, technically, they fixed an issue, that doesn't fix how it was able to become an issue in the first place. The developers are either going for "very, very thinly disguised fetish" or completely absentminded outrage farming in a very bad way.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't think bumping the child's age to a twenty something old women counts as hebephilia. But hey, you're the fucking expert here.

We have since changed the character in the scene to be a twenty-something woman, both to avoid the juxtaposition and more importantly because the dialogue delivered in that scene, which deals with the societal structure in the world of HORSES, works much better when delivered by an older character.

https://www.horses.wtf/BannedFromSteam/

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Nope, now you are giving it off more.

nervously laughs while moving away

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 16 points 1 day ago

If that's the case I can't really fault Valve here.

load more comments (12 replies)