this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
-7 points (26.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

3432 readers
10 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐Ÿ‰.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Nemo@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Well, the Slytherin in the books were largely social conservatives as written โ€” old families who did things old ways and didn't want to change or accept the new people.

[โ€“] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

What was the social commentary on the other Houses?

What I took from it:

  • Slytherin = conservatives, old money
  • Hufflepuff = average, middle of the road folk who didnt fit any of the other Houses
  • Ravenclaw = the Smartest/most purely intellectually inclined
  • Gryffindor = the Brave? Or most reckless warm-blooded folk of any kind who would throw it all away for the adventur
[โ€“] 7uWqKj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As I understood it:

Gryffindor = The brave Ravenclaw = The smart Hufflepuff = The stupid Slytherin = The evil

Or, in storytelling terms: the protagonists, the mentors, the comic relief, the antagonists.

[โ€“] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago

I think stupid is harsh, seems more communal or less individualistic/egoic perhaps even, and doesnt fit so much in any of the others

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)