this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
74 points (95.1% liked)

Bicycles

4842 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Amuletta@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

The faster you ride, the better you blend in with vehicular traffic. The trouble is, not everyone can ride that fast. Now that I'm old, I appreciate dedicated MUPs and bike lanes because they're better suited to my current abilities than they were 30 to 40 or even 20 years ago.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But also, the faster you ride, the more tiring it is, the more stressful it is, and the more severe the consequences when anybody - especially nearby drivers - makes a serious error.

Cycling doesn't have to be that way. No matter what Forester and other ableists say. If you remove most of the motorists, it can be fun! And proper fun, not the 'I jousted with drivers and survived' type.

[–] Amuletta@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, 40 years ago it wasn't all that tiring because I was a very fit young bike racer, but I get what you mean.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe, but still more tiring than being able to coast through on a more direct, comfortable and convenient cycleway instead of a motorway limited by sucky truck turning radii and visibility.

load more comments (4 replies)