this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
630 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

76917 readers
3445 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (30 children)

Yet another reason to despise AI. Animals deserve to be safe too. We've already taken so much from them as it is.

[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (24 children)

Ai has a proven track record of causing less accidents, and killing far fewer animals per km traveled than the average driver.

92% fewer accidents involving animals than the average human.

Ai doesn't drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

here you dropped this

per capita

your figures (though I doubt them) don't include the skew of driver vs driverless vehicles. of course driverless cars are 92% less likely to have an accident involving animals. that's because driverless cars account for less than 1% of the entire vehicle population.

Ai doesn't drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

but it does randomly hallucinate.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)