this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
1294 points (99.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

3490 readers
274 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x00z@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Not a viable take though. Housing, clothing, food.. none of them are free either. A more viable solution is to control the markets by setting limits, like they did here, and then provide a safety net for people so they will always be able to buy this stuff. It would be nice if it was free, but it's a long road to get there. Social politics can provide survival without abolishing stuff like money in the meanwhile.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Some people feel like if you can't provide society with your labor, you should still be fed, clothed, and housed.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think essentially everybody agrees, the debate is where to put the lines for "can't" and "needs"

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

I think you're giving people too much credit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)