this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
1 points (52.2% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3487 readers
473 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This may be true, in the same way that most Americans agreed to get involved in WW2 after Pearl Harbour... Because they finally accepted that fascists could not be stopped from committing violence, promoting terrorism, continuing the propaganda to vilify and dehumanize their opponents, or implementing their dictatorship peacefully.
This is also propaganda, because conservatives answer is entirely dependent on whether or not conservatives are in control.
I hope it is true tbh, because it couldn't be more clear that the fascist party will continue escalating their own authoritarianism, terrorism, and violence, until they get it in response, so they can finally justify their goal of mass murder and military dictatorship.
I hope this doesn't come across as undermining, but considering how often I see the term "fascist" used to describe the people who are giving society a hard time, if I may ask, how does one actually define a fascist? What are the criteria (according to those who use the term today) where, if you fit the criteria, you're a fascist, and if you're not a fascist, it's because you don't fit the criteria?
As for violence, there are a lot of people who have been killed this year whose death everyone has been cheering but who doesn't have a history of violence (or even direct control over human life). I mean, when Kirk was assassinated, one of the people who got death threats in the aftermath was Joe Rogan. In terms of individuals on that side of the political spectrum, he's as mid as you can get.
There's a semi-famous (and oft-misquoted) quote:
The point is, it's possible to take great satisfaction in the fact that someone died (or was killed) while not condoning the act itself, or supporting carrying it out. You can like the outcome even if you don't support the method.
I don't condone killing these people, but I do think the world is better off without some of them.
That much is true. I remember back when the wars George W. Bush started were still going on, anytime someone on "that side" died, it was a weird tradition in my old hometown to wake up the school kids at like five in the morning (because time zones) and say "hey, that one guy died".