this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
732 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

77164 readers
2419 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
732
SpaceX says states should dump fiber plans, give all grant money to Starlink (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 months ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
292 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

Previous satellite Internet using satellites in geosynchronous orbit had 1500ms latency, for comparison.

Yes, and are far more stable, not hyped, and are already at pretty much peak congestion. Starlink will get progressively worse, the more people use it. Right now, it's over provisioned.

The point is, unless you’re playing some hyper competitive game where a 30ms difference in reaction time is noticeable (

Ever try a voice call with 30ms of latency?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yes, and are far more stable, not hyped, and are already at pretty much peak congestion. Starlink will get progressively worse, the more people use it. Right now, it’s over provisioned.

They were not more stable. Any occlusion, including thick clouds, would degrade the signal to being unusable. I used Hughsnet for years, then swapped to cellular (100ms+ latency) and finally to Starlink. Starlink is a pretty solid 100Mb/s, with low jitter, packet loss and latency.

Ever try a voice call with 30ms of latency?

Yeah, I use voice chat every day, it's not noticeable.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

They were not more stable. Any occlusion, including thick clouds, would degrade the signal to being unusable

You have the same issue with Starlink...

Yeah, I use voice chat every day, it’s not noticeable.

The people on the call do...

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 months ago

The people on the call do...

LMAO you're really doubling down?

No, they absolutely will not notice a 30ms delay. Why would you even say something so absurd?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)