this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
1124 points (98.9% liked)

unix_surrealism

3001 readers
156 users here now

The underscore is very important!

A place to share original content related to computers, content, surrealism, wizardry and everything else.

analognowhere things of interest:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Isn't it about clippy and not microsoft

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

Yes, the people who are somehow getting the message that Louis Rossman was praising Microsoft either didn't watch the video or generally struggle with nuance, or both.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

It's not irrelevant. Using a corporate mascot as a symbol against another corporate mascot/product isn't going to spread the message Louis intended. You argue the people complaining about it aren't getting his point, but do you really think it will/has survived the word-of-mouth spreading it? The game of telephone that viral trends like this follow is lightning fast and warps messages in extreme ways. And it's not much of a stretch to assume that, if MS churned out a new Clippy chatbot, people would rally around it to spite the others since they have no understanding of why they were doing it in the first place.

*Also, people already mischaracterize the sincerity of early tech giants. I've certainly seen many people lament "the good Internet" of the mid 2000s, as if the very issues we have today weren't percolating back then. None of those companies were ever good or harmless, the idea that them or their products are "different" now is naive, and relying on that naivety to push for change is a mistake.

[–] cannonship@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

this! i’m about to create another account just to upvote this again

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)