this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
536 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

70919 readers
3312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't worry, my fellow americans, we'll still manage to fuck it up.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The combined indicator/brake light thing you guys do is fucking stupid, so there's a precedent.

[–] kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I've always hated that. I feel like I'm seeing it less and less on newer vehicles, though, so maybe manufacturers are also realizing that it's stupid as hell.

Or maybe it's just not worth the cost to have two different but mostly identical versions of a very expensive and highly integrated modern taillight housing for different markets.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

I hope so. I dug up this old video I watched ages ago that articulates really well why they're a bad idea.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed. Are they turning, or just braking periodically with a taillight out? Who knows!

I also love the front turn signals that turn off that headlight. Dumb as hell for everyone.

Also, animated signals should be banned. On or off, no flashing, glowing, or sliding.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't even get me started on the wild and wonderful design 'features' on modern cars. Fucking hell, they want you to do anything but drive the thing and pay attention to the road.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clearly it's your fault for both breaking and going around a corner at the same time. Who does that?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you edit that to 'braking', and I'll delete this comment, please? It's breaking my brain. :)

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's too late, he already broke his car while going around the corner.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll likely give those front brake lights an amber color

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It's possible. Red really is only supposed to be on the back to indicate the rear of the vehicle.

It's why on stretches of road where passing in oncoming lanes is legal, they tell you to turn on your headlights (daytime headlights section.) Its so that there is a distinguishing feature between the front and rear of the car.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 21 hours ago

The reason why I made my comment is because in the US some car manufacturers use the rear brake lights for the indicator lights too. Which is just stupid and dangerous and thankfully illegal in Europe.

It would be really stupid to have amber brake lights in the front. And given US car manufacturers track record, they'd be so stupid to repurpose the front indicator lights as front brake lights to cut costs.

Make it blue or green or any other color, but not amber or white.
The amber color should only be used for the indicator lights, and should be amber on the front, side and back of the car.