this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
214 points (98.6% liked)

Star Wars

5892 readers
1 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world is a place for those.

  5. Posts must be coherent.

  6. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

MOTHERFUCKER. Now what are they going to do?!?!! They give us a taste of Darth Plaguis and Yoda 100 years younger and they CANCEL it?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I dunno. Leave it be hopefully. The show just looked really cheap. Their clothes looked like costumes instead of actual clothes. Not to mention how poor the makeup was for everyone.

Maybe I just prefer quality over quantity.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And yet it carried a $180m budget, more than something like dune part 1 (and slightly less than part 2).

[–] pixel_prophet@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is probably a lot of creative accounting happening with a lot of those types of numbers. Any Disney + ad that has something to do with the Acolyte probably gets counted in that total. Countless examples of movies and shows with way smaller budgets that end up looking a lot better than most of the recent Disney slop.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I guess marketing getting rolled into that number, as opposed to movie budgets where it is usually separate could make up for it. Or it includes lots of long-term investments similar to the huge stage surrounded by screens ("the volume") that they used for the mandalorian. Although I am not aware that acolyte did something like that.

Countless examples of movies and shows with way smaller budgets that end up looking a lot better than most of the recent Disney slop.

Yeah, but that just goes to prove that money doesn't solve every problem. It didn't fix the writing either. The spending part is easy enough.

load more comments (1 replies)