this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
78 points (89.0% liked)
Opensource
5416 readers
95 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It sucks for FOSS projects, but you have to imagine their rules from the perspective of someone who is actively trying to bend the rules to avoid giving Valve their cut. If they make an exception for FOSS projects, then every indie developer will claim to be "Shareware" and solicit donations off-platform.
Even Epic Games tried this and ended up in a lawsuit with Apple.
FOSS and Shareware are very different things. It's easy for Valve to add an option for FOSS projects where the publisher must enter which license is being used (from a list of pre-approved licenses) and a link to the source code including all artwork.
They won't do it, because they don't want to become a FOSS rating and distribution service. They make money by selling proprietary software. FOSS goes against their business model.
And yet a valve has singlehandedly been the driving force to bring Linux desktop to mainstream users.
Because in that very particular instance, it goes towards their business model. It helps them sell more games.