this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
135 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

53618 readers
57 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (14 children)

yet another reason to back flatpaks and distro-agnostic software packaging. We cant afford to use dozens of build systems to maintain dozens of functionally-identical application repositories

[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

This is such a superficial take.

Flatpaks have their use-case. Alpine has its use-case as a small footprint distro, focused on security. Using flatpaks would nuke that ethos.

Furthermore, they need those servers to build their core and base system packages. There is no distro out there that uses flatpaks or appimages for their CORE.

Any distro needs to build their toolchain, libs and core. Flatpaks are irrelevant to this discussion.

At the risk of repteating myself, flatpaks are irrelevant to Alpine because its a small footprint distro, used alot in container base images, containers use their own packaging!

Furthermore, flatpaks are literal bloat, compared to alpines' apk packages which focus on security and minimalism.

Edit: Flatpak literally uses alpine to build its packages. No alpine, no flatpaks. Period

Flatpaks have their use. This is not that. Check your ignorance.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

/s This was a Snap trap and you walked right into it!! You are right, Flatpaks are great bit you cannot use them for everything. We all need to switch to Snaps so we can build our base packages in them!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)