Hardware

5247 readers

81 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@piefed.social
Laptops - !laptops@piefed.social
Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world

Digital Foundry Believes that Nintendo Switch 2's Tegra T239 SoC is 8 nm Part (www.techpowerup.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee to c/hardware@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the past, Digital Foundry theorized that the NVIDIA-designed Tegra T239 will be an 8 nanometer part—rumored to be built on Samsung 8 nm DUV foundry node. Newer gaming community-generated proposals have suggested a shift to Samsung's 5 nm EUV node—mostly based on the chipset's physical footprint. In sharp contrast, the Digital Foundry guys are sticking with their 8 nm theory.

If Digital Foundry is correct, then Nintendo is using a node from around ~5 years ago. Nvidia's 3000 series were fabbed on Samsung's 8 nm node.

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

isn't the GPU Ampere? aka 3000 series, which was 8nm as you say

would be kinda crazy if both the arch and the node are so old, I'm really hoping for a decent new Shield TV...

but the current Shield TV is Maxwell and 16nm lol so anything would be an upgrade at this point

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

It's a very Nintendo move to use an old crusty node for cost cutting. The switch launched with an already 2 year old SOC built on the TSMC 20nm node which was already at least 1 node behind. And since then cost per mm^2 has skyrocketed. Maybe Samsungs 8nm is cheap at this point?

My concern is that Samsungs 8nm node was kind ass compared to TSMC. Outside of raytracing AMD was able to meet or exceed Nvidia's performance pet watt because it was so ass. I had an RTX 3080 powered laptop and that GPU sucks down no less than 20 watts when activated even when not doing anything. Unless it scales really well at lower clock speeds I'm not having high hopes for the battery life of the switch 2. But hey it gives them a route to sell an upgraded Switch 2 2 in a few years and the gamers will slurp it up.