this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
1016 points (97.8% liked)

memes

22324 readers
1227 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago (17 children)

I'm not sure what other system is even conceivably possible in the general case. There's no straightforward universal relationship between tariffs paid by businesses and prices paid by the customers of those businesses.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Take the total tariff income, divide it by the number of people in the country, and send out the checks.

It's the ONLY legitimate way to handle it.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That sounds fair in theory, but would not hold up as soon as the first person felt slighted and challenged those terms in court.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Let them. It's better than "nobody will let it be fair so we won't even try."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)