this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
302 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1877 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly half of all Democrats in the House of Representatives voted Wednesday to cut off US military aid to Israel, a move that underscored a dramatic shift away from the US support the Mideast ally has enjoyed for nearly 60 years.

While House lawmakers ultimately rejected Rep. Thomas Massie's (R-Ky.) amendment to a national security spending bill that would have eliminated the $3.3 billion in annual foreign military financing provided to Israel’s military, the details of the vote were viewed as an encouraging sign by defenders of Palestine and the rule of law.

Massie and 103 Democrats voted for the measure, while 215 Republicans and 98 Democrats rejected it. The overall tally was 104 for, 314 against, and 10 "present" votes, with 9 absences.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 1 month ago (14 children)

And all it took were democrats throwing a presidential election and getting ousted in primaries by progressives to get there.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 month ago (11 children)

And it proves what many have been saying. The primaries are the time for you to cast your protest vote, not the generals.

[–] falcunculus@jlai.lu 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sorry citizen, your time for self expression and democracy, as materialized by a single vote for one preset option you had no voice towards, in an election rigged by the party brass, has passed. Please go back to being an obedient worker drone. See you in two years, which is plenty often enough for a satisfactory democracy!

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You (general you, not you personally) can and should express your opinion in other ways as well. It's just the price / collateral damage that's far higher in the general election. You'll express frustration at some issues and sacrifice others in the process, without achieving much.

You won't tear down that pyramid by ripping the golden cover off the top. Attack the base, shatter the bricks holding up the corrupt tip, and the whole thing will start shaking.

Notice that the party brass didn't throw as much of a tantrum about the lost presidency as they did about the slew of progressives unseating "safe" candidates in primaries. That's where they actually start to worry.

Votes need to be a tool for establishing public consensus, but that doesn't mean they have to be the only tool.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Some tools can be appropriated, and some tools will be needed to build a new house. Don't discard them all.

Voting alone may not be enough, but it's a useful way to communicate public opinion. Establishing the consensus that enough people are behind you encourages participation in direct action, and building democratic legitimacy helps make your changes stick.

You probably need more than votes to achieve change, but you'll need them to make it last.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)