this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
368 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
86364 readers
3084 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Edit 2: The below sentence does not contain an "as" between "might" and "well". I'm wondering if people are seeing one there and are thinking I'm saying something that I'm not, because that word completely changes the meaning of the sentence.
He has fallen into the trap of making constitutional decisions for himself and others rather than going through the proper channels and so they might well throw the book at him.
Yes, I know "the proper channels" will do their very best to ignore, deny or obfuscate as long as they can in order to avoid the question of constitutionality (or legality) of such systems, and that's why he did it, but he might have had a slightly better defence if he'd at least tried to sue or challenge Flock's existence and use by less destructive means before doing this.
Edit: Based on the number of downvotes, it seems like a lot of people know something I don't. The only comment that suggests anything at all though, provides exactly the same amount of evidence that I have for my point of view than they do for theirs.
Do you know for sure he did not attempt any of the "right" ways you're suggesting?
I would have thought that the article would have mentioned it, because that would make for an interesting part to the story. It does not seem to do so.
If only there were any journalists left in the world, you might be able to make that assumption.