this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
62 points (90.8% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

9148 readers
37 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The problem with gatekeepers, is that their reputation is trashed by people who take it to the extreme. I still feel that gatekeepers in general are important to have for communities and fandoms. But the kind of gatekeepers we could use more of, are ones who're actually not just weeding out the fakers from the authentic types, but to actually educate a little about what a community is all about from being devoted to a basic fan.

I see too many times, people running around with wiccan stars and satanic symbols, but are only wearing them for cool-factor purposes. But if you came up to one of them to hold a brief conversation as to whether or not they even care of or know the meaning behind the symbols that they're projecting, more often times than not, they are largely using them because they looked cool to them.

Now as a gatekeeper in that position who is asking the questions, would it be wiser to actually educate them or just scream at them crazily? You could educate them a little and if the answers still boil down to "tee hee, I just think they cool anyways, I don't care" then you're permitted to brand them as bullshitters and an insult to actual people who take these symbols to heart.

You just don't simply want a lot of people misrepresenting and confusing something you care about, because it is damaging an identity at the end of the day. That's why gatekeepers are important to have around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SayJess@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Are you the one then who gatekeeps who is allowed to be a gatekeeper, and whether something is acceptable? An example: I really like the aesthetic of upside-down 5 pointed stars. Is there some sort of meaning and history behind them? Don’t know. Am I allowed to like them? Or should I feel shame for not looking up the symbolism in everything that I like? Do I really need to educate myself on the occult in order to like something that might hold meaning to someone else?

Purity tests for fandoms are gross. No one, save for those who take these things way too seriously, cares about how hardcore you are.

Great unpopular opinion!

[–] Nytefyre@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Being a gatekeeper isn't to be treated like its some unpaid employment. But, what would actually help in that example scenario, is if there is a universal agreement among the more knowledgeable members about what makes exactly what within a community or fandom. There can be a few branches to help weed out those from the fakers and the authentic members and there can be a level-support system to help measure up to.

Like to the example I used about religious symbolism, to expand on, do you necessarily have to practice magic to be a wiccan? Not precisely. There are other ways or methods that you could pledge yourself to, to be a Wiccan, it doesn't have to always be about practicing magic although these days it is stereotyped. Though there are Wiccans who do practice magic, so where would they be? They'd be gatekeepers but only a subset, a portion in their own little spot. So, there is them and then there is another subset of people within the community that would be there to be there for those that help those identifying as Wiccan to educate them that 'nah, you don't always have to practice magic'.

It just goes by layers but there will be established layers that all are supposed to help filter a community from those falsely representing it.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah no. Great post though!

load more comments (2 replies)