this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
488 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30960 readers
2040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the article:

A bill making its way through the North Carolina Legislature states it would be permissible for a person to use deadly force on a woman they believe is seeking an abortion, something Democrats have branded as "wildly extreme."

The legislation, now only backed by Republican State Representative Keith Kidwell, would classify abortion as first-degree murder and open up the right of another person to defend the life of the unborn baby as they see fit.

"Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person," the bill reads. "The State has an interest and a duty to defend innocent persons from willful destruction of their lives and to punish those who take the lives of persons, born or unborn, who have not committed any crime punishable by death."

Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/republican-bill-deadly-force-stop-abortions-north-carolina-12005136

Nothing says being pro-unborn-child like murdering the mother while she's pregnant. That'd really protect the fetus.

Who am I kidding? It's really a cover hoping that someone will storm in and kill the doctors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Finally someone tells that ugly goblin to shut up.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

insulting to ugly people though

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Nah, only if they look like a human q-tip and have all the inner character of Joseph Goebbels. Then yeah, I'd expect there would be a bit of unwanted self-recognition.

Oh, the horror. Let me just cry some liberal tears over here for the weird-ass no-discernible-conscience Miller/Goebbels-lookalike NPC motherfuckers personally affected by this egregious slur. Okay, done.

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Ugly on the inside.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is that Talarico? I didn't know he was trans. Or is Steven Millhouse just full of shit?

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

no, the mastermind of the regime is genuinely essentially just saying "ur gay" like a middle schooler in 2003. that's the best he could come up with. and it will work with their voter base

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago

Copy-and-pasting this from another thread:

Republicans must be scared of Talarico. His message seems to resonate with his base. He's a white christian man, so in other words "Just a great guy!" in their view.

Also, he's not afraid to call out the establishment. The republican base likes that kind of stuff, they've just been misled into believing that "the establishment" means jews and diversity hires instead of corporate-financial oligarchs and their political lackeys.

Talarico has been pretty effective at meeting these people where they're at and redirecting their ire towards the oligarchy where it belongs.

That must terrify republican politicians.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

He isn't, but calling someone trans is the new calling someone gay.