Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.
Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
In the latest episode of "behold the power of Mythos" from The Hacker News - Claude Mythos AI Finds 10,000 High-Severity Flaws in Widely Used Software
I distilled it so you don't have to.
That 10,000 count didn't even survive until paragraph 3.
Ah fuck. 1726. But wait, a bad infographic has entered the ring!
Ok now we're talking.
Wait, what? Why those? Why only those?
You couldn't even cherry pick the valid ones?
Where did the other 1259 go? Maybe this other part of the flowchart will go better...
Most of them just spammed at open source maintainers. Right. Maybe Anthropic's media release has the goods!
Slightly lower than the 1900, but ok, whatever.
1587 is lower than the infographic's 1726 confirmed positives.... But 10% of 10000 high sev is still something, right?
I'm sure those maintainers enjoyed that 16% high+ sec rate based on Mythos' own estimations. But wasn't that 1129 the bulk of your reports?
530 is only a third of the reports you made to maintainers...
The infographic says 88.
I'd ask if they were massaging their financials like they massaged 65 advisories, but we know they are.
23,019 potential vulnerability candidates of all severities, 65 advisories. If you printed the code out and drunkenly threw darts at it you'd probably hit the same level of accuracy.
1 cve, 100 things that might have mattered.
2 orders of magnitude false positives doesn't sound like an efficient use of labour for finding vulnerabilities but that's just me.