primrosepathspeedrun

joined 2 months ago

Also atomized! Don't forget atomized!

If they get it, it needs to be intimidating and creative.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's no longer just a matter of ending a couple hundred rich asshole families who we already beat in war. That was the ounce of prevention. It's so much messier now.

What, were the Klan gonna be friendly to him before?

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We would not. Those slaver dynasties needed to end. Their culture–the culture of slavery–needed to be genocided.

That dog is tarted all the way up

Yes we are. Any day now?

"Aimed at protecting children"

Oh, is there a law aimed at protecting children effecting software that I'm not aware of? Some anti-dark-pattern thing? Something for epileptics?

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right but being more technically correct does not make you a better communicator or more likely to be listened to. Creating approximately correct-ish ideas in the minds of your audience to counter absolute fictions is much more important unless youre in a lab or talking to an engineer about engineering.

Precision and rigor have negative rhetorical weight.

view more: ‹ prev next ›