GitHub stole most of the spotlight this week after announcing it was going to begin charging customers for self-hosted Actions runner usage while simultaneously reducing the price for those hosted by the platform. Cue the intense backlash from users who hate paying for things
This is certainly a take. And not a good one. JFC, you can't imagine why people would be upset about being charged to run stuff on your own infrastructure? What is Ethan smoking here??
you could slap a mobile gui on VKDT, but it wouldn't be compatible with darktable
Yes. The decoder decodes. There are several open source ones, libraw, rawspeed, rawler. They all do the same thing.
At least for rawpseed, things aren't always straight forward, as all camera support is reverse engineered. Don't have data from the manufacturers as its all locked up behind NDAs and such
There are open-source RAW decoders, like LibRaw, and while they offer broad support, Bhatt says they typically deliver worse results,
Bullshit. It either decodes the raw file and passes the data into the editing pipeline or it doesn't.
This is the way.
https://github.com/tchapi/davis uses the same library as nextcloud (and basically every other Foss calendar app) and just tries to wrap an admin interface around it.
Take a look at ytdl-sub if you want light weight. I load the resulting videos into jellyfin as series.
Couldn't even read it, that yellow text is horrific.
How does "major version upgrades" make it into the "so-so" category? This is one of the best (long term) features of NixOS, since stuff does not really break, you can easily test it with VM tests. What he describes in this seciton is that plasma 6 didn't make it into that "stable" version of NixOS... but it'd be the same on any other distro, more or less?
Picard has always worked pretty well for me. No complains.
Picard or beets will help you with your metadata.
Nobody wants plebbit.