bstix

joined 3 years ago
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 9 months ago

Det er også fint nok. Det er det samme som den del virksomheder ikke kan trække fra. Hvis alle dermed betaler den samme afgift pr. kWh så er jeg tilfreds.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 9 months ago

You're not thinking big: Rent out other people's faces!

Instead of an actual click farm where slave workers click phones all day, you make an app.

The app works like this: When the users (or let's call them: "Partners") get a notification from your app, they just have to smile at the camera, sometimes do other expressions. They are then rewarded with points which they can trade for for actual real life discounts on real online stores. Something like 1 cent per picture.

You now setup a service for people who want to bypass facial age verification and feed their requests directly to the app for a small fee of 5 cents per verification.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Jeg så gerne at man fjernede den helt. Den rammer de forkerte.

Virksomheder trækker det fra i momsangivelsen. Private med elbil eller elvarme får det refunderet. Folk med lav indtægt har i flere år fået en "grøn check" som fradrag på skatteopgørelsen som hjælp til at betale grønne afgifter. Altså, man skal nærmest gøre sig umage for rent faktisk at bidrage til at betale de grønne afgifter.

Det eneste resultat er at den øger moms-grundlaget, som private ikke kan fradrage.

I min optik burde den slags afgifter ligge der hvor der forbruges mest strøm: I industrien. Så må de øge deres priser eller lave energibesparende tiltag eller hvad der nu skal til.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 17 points 9 months ago

MAGA: Why did he make them do that to him?

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 9 months ago

I'd advise you to get the type 2 home charger anyway. Even if your expected mileage is very low.

The savings of not getting one aren't worth the hassle of having to charge slowly constantly, and being depended on that slow charge.

A proper charger will enable you to take spontaneous drives more often. It could allow you to take advantage of cheap hourly rates (if that's an option). It removes the dependence on public chargers. It'll be fast enough for two cars if you eventually need that in case one of you gets a new job or you have family visiting etc.

So, sure, you don't neeeeed it, but it's easier in all of those situations that are just a little outside the ordinary and optimized commuting schedule.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 9 months ago

None, but I do tag trolls and other kinds of idiots, so I can avoid replying to them but still read what they're up to.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 18 points 9 months ago

It doesn’t matter if you have no other clothes

I'm going to report you to the fashion police.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 9 months ago

Travel somewhere. It will break your habits and offer you new things to think about.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I once lost my glasses and used an ordinary drinking glass as a monocle as substitute. It wasn't perfect, but good enough for me to find my glasses. (This was before cell phones had cameras).

Having been very near sighted for most of my life, I've come to the conclusion that it's not really that big of a handicap. It's mostly an issue for reading things, and even that can be done when putting it close enough.

I can't really think of anything in a hypothetical apocalypse where 20/20 vision would be absolutely necessary.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's just salt water.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 9 months ago

Besides the fast chopping, that guy also knows that his time is worth more than the piece of onion that he discards at the end.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 9 months ago

Probably the usual stuff. Putin put on a suit, swore his loyalty to Trump and said "thank you".

/s

view more: ‹ prev next ›