Dpek

joined 5 days ago
[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 minutes ago

Lets make a compromise

Deadnt

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 0 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

While your question has already been answered, i would like to add

Pcie is very compatible, its both backwards and forewards compatible (sure it wont be as fast but it will work)

Pretty sure you should be able to do something like takeing a rtx 5090 and a dremmel and puting it in a gen 1 pcie x1 slot

(Wether you cut the back of the x1 slot or cut the rtx 5090 is up for reader interpritation)

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 3 points 37 minutes ago

Ive seen some places introduce multiple sizes of shoping carts

Large, same design but what? 20% smaller? and kid sized but with a pole and a grip

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 1 points 52 minutes ago

What is heat but shaken atoms?

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Gonna assume kelvin

Think C but what if zero was actualy zero

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

A bar of disappoitment

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Lets hope CCA doesnt strike again

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Elons monument to compensation can barely make a single orbit

Unlike with the spaceshuttle there are more regulations for safety. Most of the starship flights could have gone to orbit (exept 1,2,7 and 8, debatable on 9) , but its just that its an unneeded risk

This reminds me of a quote i saw about the spaceshuttle i saw some time ago

"You know you're in trouble when the Russians are adding safety features to your design"

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Its problem is that its useless for its program for anything other then short term

Too expensive with too low launch cadance to do anything alone

Non of the first 3 launches will or have used the same heatshield due to a dangerus flaw only found in artemis 1, despite a launch haveing already happened specifucly to test the heatshield (and ofcource the new heatshield will not have an unmanned test, at least its "just" a reentry from lower earth orbit so if it has anotehr problem its less likely to fail completely and have crew loss).Theres a reason why non of the final HLS options used sls ,you simply arent getting sustained long term presence on the moon while being unable to launch more then once yearly and takeng around 1/10 of the entire nasa buget per launch.

Considering im seeing atlas missile in the background of the first one , may as well "just" take the old saturn 5s from the museums

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

What better way to prevent war then ensureing your primary enemy is fiscally , demographically and politically unable to fight?

Let alone militarily

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Dams normaly have a specificly designed spillway as it could otherwise be VERY dangerus (the water removeing dirt at its base , possably leading to dam failure)

I doubt the solar panels were put on it tho

If water is just overflowing it entirely like a glass of water then shits so fucked that the solar panels just dont matter

view more: next ›