Hmm, is it better or worse that they’re now officially treating SICP as a literal holy book?
I'm gonna say "worse", because it turned the SCP writers into unwitting accomplices to a literal cult.
BlueMonday1984
joined 2 years ago
The deaths just keep coming: the Wall Street Journal's just reported on a murder-suicide caused by ChatGPT.
Its probably the most reliable AI detector there is.
Even if someone's actively misrepresenting statistics/sources to push some kind of grift, those underlying stats/sources are near-certainly going to be genuine if they aren't using AI - not out of any moral obligation, but because made-up stats/sources will get their entire grift thrown out if they're discovered.
(wonder how long it is before the US degrades far enough that other countries start ratcheting up border/traveller defenses, compared to the current ~free rein they have (which, y’know, was owed to years of hard and soft power that the orange man is also rapidly pissing away))
By my guess, not that long. If you have reports of American inadequacy during an outbreak (pretty likely), or horror stories of your countrymen getting persecuted (should be easy to find), you should have a solid political case for border lockdowns.
Focusing on Canada and Mexico specifically, I expect Canada will build its metaphorical walls first - the ongoing drug war in Mexico, plus the brutality of its cartels, will likely act to deter would-be American refugees from there.
OpenAI has stated its scanning users' conversations (as if they weren't already) and reporting conversations to the cops in response to the recent teen suicide I mentioned a couple days ago.
So, rather than let ChatGPT drive users to kill themselves, its just going to SWAT users and have the cops do the job.
(On an arguably more comedic note, the AI doomers are accusing OpenAI of betraying humankind.)
Ethan Marcotte's given his thoughts on the new "America by Design" web page, noting how its shittiness aligns perfectly with the Trump administration's values.
Besides, there's better things to scam the Saudis with. Like getting them to put money into Newcastle United, an investment which earned us our first domestic trophy since 1955 and earned the club a whole lot of money in general.
To repeat: $43 billion in imaginary dollars beats $22.5 billion in real, actual dollars in your hands.
If this doesn't sum up the entire bubble in a single sentence, I don't know what does.
Quantum as a concept doesn't really have any way to co-opt creativity that I can see - its a rather "science-y" concept in the public eye, far away from anything associated with the arts.
Probably won't stop the hucksters, though - they'll happily make shit up if it means butting in on artists' turf.
It also wouldn't give Microsoft something to justify AI's existence with - they aren't selling "automated Excel commands", they're selling "magical chatbots which do everything".
Found a couple articles about blunting AI's impact on education (got them off of Audrey Watters' blog, for the record).
The first is a New York Times guest essay by NYU vice provost Clay Shirky, which recommends "moving away from take-home assignments and essays and toward [...] assessments that call on students to demonstrate knowledge in real time."
The second is an article by Kate Manne calling for professors to prevent cheating via AI, which details her efforts in doing so:
Manne does note the problems with this (outing disabled students, class time spent writing, and difficulties in editing, rewriting, and make-up work), but still believes "it is better, on balance, to take this approach rather than risk a significant proportion of students using AI to write their essays."