this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

3520 readers
101 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/15863526

Steven Anderegg allegedly used the Stable Diffusion AI model to generate photos; if convicted, he could face up to 70 years in prison

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How are they abuse images if no abuse took place to create them?

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because they are images of children being graphically raped, a form of abuse. Is an AI generated picture of a tree not a picture of a tree?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No it isn't, not anymore than a drawing of a car is a real car, or drawings of money are real money.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Material showing a child being sexually abused is child sexual abuse material.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And an AI generated image does not show a child being abused

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no child being abused by a generated image or a drawing.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If Paedophile Hill is the hill you want to die on, it's no loss to me, so I've got zero interest in your "Ceci n'est pas une child rape" defense.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And yet you still engaged with it. If we're gonna classify every picture/drawing/gen that makes people uncomfortable as CSAM it distracts from the actual CSAM that is running rampant