this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1813 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good. Go after trusts.

At a former workplace of mine, I overheard the directors discussing how their family trusts worked to minimise tax. These guys were on around a million dollar a year. (Publicly listed company)

I remember one saying, don't worry, the government will never change the laws on trusts as they all use them too.

Never thought this labor govt would grow a spine, but it appears that's slowly happening.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, my ex boss was the same. He used one because it reduced tax

Trusts are 100% tax dodging

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 14 points 2 days ago

I'm fine with taxing inherited wealth. Why should my landlord's kids be my kid's landlords by default?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

the old unearned income tax.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even for the poor, anyone with superannuation may be caught paying a tax when it passes on to your beneficiaries.

Basically, your super may be split into a taxable and non-taxable part. And you have to pay 15% on the taxable part when it is withdrawn. So, when you die, that 15% of the taxable part has to be paid.

There are ways to avoid this. Best to speak to a financial adviser, as it depends on age, financial position etc.

This is not financial advice. I am not a financial adviser.